Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;42(9):20120436.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120436. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

Dynamic MRI of the TMJ under physical load

Affiliations

Dynamic MRI of the TMJ under physical load

A J Hopfgartner et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the kinematics of structures of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) under physiological load while masticating.

Methods: Radial MRI was chosen as a fast imaging method to dynamically capture the motions of the joint's anatomy. The technique included a golden ratio-based increment angle and a sliding window reconstruction. The measurements were performed on 22 subjects with and without deformation/displacement of the intra-articular disc while they were biting on a cooled caramel toffee.

Results: The reconstructed dynamic images provided sufficient information about the size and localization of the disc as well as the change of the intra-articular distance with and without loading.

Conclusions: The feasibility of the golden ratio-based radial MRI technique to dynamically capture the anatomy of the TMJ under physical load was demonstrated in this initial study.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); temporomandibular joint (TMJ); temporomandibular joint disc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A sliding window reconstruction with linear (top) vs golden ratio (middle) radial sampling and the k-space-weighted image contrast filter (bottom) is shown. The box depicts the reconstruction window sliding along time axis over the data set. In the two-dimensional images, the k-space of the reconstruction frame is shown. Big and irregular gaps result in strong artefacts. A linearly filled up k-space demands a rather wide reconstruction window that may in turn result in motion artefacts
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical set-up of a temporomandibular joint measurement. The subject is placed between two multichannel coils that do not interfere with the jaw motion. Cushions stabilize the head to prevent motion artefacts and misaligned slices. All measurements were well tolerated by the subjects
Figure 3
Figure 3
Before and after performing a principle component analysis. A considerable amount of noise could be removed from the image, and the boundaries of the structures become better delineated
Figure 4
Figure 4
Exemplary image series of a healthy joint (right side) during opening of the mouth. The mouth is (upper left) closed at the beginning of the measurement and wide open (bottom right) at the end. The physiological movement of the disc in the intra-articular space is visible (arrow). The series is reconstructed using the k-space-weighted image contrast filter at constant Nyquist sampling
Figure 5
Figure 5
Right temporomandibular joint during an ipsilateral loaded (left) and unloaded (right) closing movement of the jaw. At the end of the series terminal occlusion is reached. While biting on candy, the cartilage in the intra-articular space is more compressed than in the unloaded state
Figure 6
Figure 6
The MR image on the left-hand side shows a static measurement of the temporomandibular joint with imaging parameters comparable with the dynamic measurement. On the right-hand side, the last image of a dynamic series of the same joint in terminal occlusion under loading is shown. The deepest point of the fossa is marked with a line, whereas the dotted and dashed lines indicate the topmost point of the condyle. Note the different distances

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scrivani SJ, Keith DA, Kaban LB. Temporomandibular disorders. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2693–2705 10.1056/NEJMra0802472 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okeson JP, Bell WE. Bell’s orofacial pains. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 1995
    1. Suma S, Veerendra Kumar B. Temporomandibular disorders and functional somatic syndromes: deliberations for the dentist. Indian J Dent Res 2012; 23: 529–536 10.4103/0970-9290.104965 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rues S, Lenz J, Türp JC, Schweizerhof K, Schindler HJ. Muscle and joint forces under variable equilibrium states of the mandible. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 15: 737–747 10.1007/s00784-010-0436-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwasaki LR, Crosby MJ, Gonzalez Y, McCall WD, Marx DB, Ohrbach R, et al. Temporomandibular joint loads in subjects with and without disc displacement. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009; 1: 90–3 10.4081/or.2009.e29 - DOI - PMC - PubMed