Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Aug;10(8):e1001502.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001502. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

Risk of early-onset neonatal infection with maternal infection or colonization: a global systematic review and meta-analysis

Grace J Chan  1 , Anne C C Lee, Abdullah H Baqui, Jingwen Tan, Robert E Black
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of early-onset neonatal infection with maternal infection or colonization: a global systematic review and meta-analysis

Grace J Chan et al. PLoS Med. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal infections cause a significant proportion of deaths in the first week of life, yet little is known about risk factors and pathways of transmission for early-onset neonatal sepsis globally. We aimed to estimate the risk of neonatal infection (excluding sexually transmitted diseases [STDs] or congenital infections) in the first seven days of life among newborns of mothers with bacterial infection or colonization during the intrapartum period.

Methods and findings: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization Regional Databases for studies of maternal infection, vertical transmission, and neonatal infection published from January 1, 1960 to March 30, 2013. Studies were included that reported effect measures on the risk of neonatal infection among newborns exposed to maternal infection. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool data and calculate the odds ratio estimates of risk of infection. Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies (8.4%) were from high neonatal mortality settings. Considerable heterogeneity existed between studies given the various definitions of laboratory-confirmed and clinical signs of infection, as well as for colonization and risk factors. The odds ratio for neonatal lab-confirmed infection among newborns of mothers with lab-confirmed infection was 6.6 (95% CI 3.9-11.2). Newborns of mothers with colonization had a 9.4 (95% CI 3.1-28.5) times higher odds of lab-confirmed infection than newborns of non-colonized mothers. Newborns of mothers with risk factors for infection (defined as prelabour rupture of membranes [PROM], preterm <37 weeks PROM, and prolonged ROM) had a 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-5.4) times higher odds of infection than newborns of mothers without risk factors.

Conclusions: Neonatal infection in the first week of life is associated with maternal infection and colonization. High-quality studies, particularly from settings with high neonatal mortality, are needed to determine whether targeting treatment of maternal infections or colonization, and/or prophylactic antibiotic treatment of newborns of high risk mothers, may prevent a significant proportion of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Maternal infection and neonatal infection.
*Adjusted ORs. These studies provided estimates adjusted for confounding factors.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Maternal GBS colonization and neonatal infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Maternal colonization and neonatal colonization.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Maternal risk factors and neonatal infection.
*Adjusted ORs. These studies provided estimates adjusted for confounding factors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, et al. (2012) Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 379: 2151–2161. - PubMed
    1. Oestergaard MZ, Inoue M, Yoshida S, Mahanani WR, Gore FM, et al. (2011) Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: a systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities. PLoS Med 8: e1001080 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001080 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baqui AH, Darmstadt GL, Williams EK, Kumar V, Kiran TU, et al. (2006) Rates, timing and causes of neonatal deaths in rural India: implications for neonatal health programmes. Bull World Health Organ 84: 706–713. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Lee AC, Kinney M, Sibley L, Carlo WA, et al. (2009) Two million intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: where, why, and what can be done? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107 Suppl 1: S5–18, S19. - PubMed
    1. Al-Adnani M, Sebire NJ (2007) The role of perinatal pathological examination in subclinical infection in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21: 505–521. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances