Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;23(5):414-21.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review

Magdalena Z Raban et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Medication administration errors are frequent and lead to patient harm. Interruptions during medication administration have been implicated as a potential contributory factor.

Objective: To assess evidence of the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing interruptions during medication administration on interruption and medication administration error rates.

Methods: In September 2012 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group reviews, Google and Google Scholar, and hand searched references of included articles. Intervention studies reporting quantitative data based on direct observations of at least one outcome (interruptions, or medication administration errors) were included.

Results: Ten studies, eight from North America and two from Europe, met the inclusion criteria. Five measured significant changes in interruption rates pre and post interventions. Four found a significant reduction and one an increase. Three studies measured changes in medication administration error rates and showed reductions, but all implemented multiple interventions beyond those targeted at reducing interruptions. No study used a controlled design pre and post. Definitions for key outcome indicators were reported in only four studies. Only one study reported κ scores for inter-rater reliability and none of the multi-ward studies accounted for clustering in their analyses.

Conclusions: There is weak evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to significantly reduce interruption rates and very limited evidence of their effectiveness to reduce medication administration errors. Policy makers should proceed with great caution in implementing such interventions until controlled trials confirm their value. Research is also required to better understand the complex relationship between interruptions and error to support intervention design.

Keywords: Health services research; Hospital medicine; Interruptions; Medication safety; Nurses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of search strategy and selection process to identify studies for review; *Two papers reported the same study; †This included 8 studies indentified through the database searches and the two studies identified through Google and Google Scholar searches.

References

    1. National Patient Safety Agency. Safety in doses: improving the use of medicine in the NHS. London: National Patient Safety Agency, 2009
    1. Phillips J, Beam S, Brinker BA. Retrospective analysis of mortalities associated with medication errors. Am J Hlth Sys Pharm 2001;58:1835–41 - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA 1995;274:29–34 - PubMed
    1. Barker KN, Flynn EA, Pepper GA, et al. Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1897–903 - PubMed
    1. Munoz A, Miguez A, Perez M, et al. Medication error prevalence. Int J Hlth Care Qual Assurance 2010;23:328–38 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms