Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Nov 27;96(10):897-903.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a203bd.

OSAKA trial: a randomized, controlled trial comparing tacrolimus QD and BD in kidney transplantation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

OSAKA trial: a randomized, controlled trial comparing tacrolimus QD and BD in kidney transplantation

Laetitia Albano et al. Transplantation. .

Erratum in

  • Transplantation. 2014 Mar 27;97(6):38

Abstract

Background: The once-daily (QD), prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus has been shown to improve adherence versus twice-daily (BD) tacrolimus. Treatment nonadherence in transplant recipients has been associated with poor graft outcomes.

Methods: This open-label, parallel-group study randomized adults with end-stage renal disease undergoing primary kidney transplantation or retransplantation to an initial dose of tacrolimus BD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 1; n=309), QD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 2; n=302), QD 0.3 mg/kg per day (Arm 3; n=304) all with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids (tapered) over 24 weeks, or tacrolimus QD 0.2 mg/kg per day with mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and corticosteroids given only perioperatively (Arm 4; n=283). The primary composite endpoint (efficacy failure; per protocol set) was defined as graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, or graft dysfunction at week 24. Graft dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4 formula of less than 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The prespecified noninferiority margin was 12.5%.

Results: The per protocol set included 976 patients: 237, 263, 246, and 230 patients in Arms 1 to 4, respectively. Noninferiority of the composite endpoint was demonstrated for Arm 2 versus Arm 1; Kaplan-Meier estimates of efficacy failure were 42.2% and 40.6%, respectively (difference, -1.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.2% to 9.0%). Noninferiority to Arm 1 was not confirmed for Arm 3 (difference, -3.5%; 95% CI, -13.6% to 6.6%) or Arm 4 (difference, -7.1%; 95% CI, -16.1% to 1.9%). Graft dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was the main determinant of composite-endpoint efficacy failure across all arms.

Conclusions: In patients representative of the European kidney transplant population, tacrolimus QD-based immunosuppression (0.2 mg/kg/day), without induction, showed similar efficacy to 0.2 mg/kg per day tacrolimus BD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00717470.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient populations and reasons for discontinuation. Patients were excluded from the PPS for major protocol violations; the rate of exclusion ranged from 13.6% to 22.2% across arms. The most commonly reported protocol violation was a deviation of the initial dose of study drug that was either greater than or less than 10% of the recommended dose. Bas, basiliximab; FAS, full anaysis set; PPS, per protocol set; SAF, safety set.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Primary endpoint: (A) efficacy failure rates (PPS) and (B) efficacy failure rates (FAS). Data represent the first event for each patient. BCAR, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection; CS, corticosteroid; FAS, full analysis set; PPS, per protocol set.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Measurements of (A) eGFR at 24 weeks (FAS), (B) time course of eGFR in patients who received a kidney from a deceased donor (FAS), and (C) time course of eGFR in patients who received a kidney from a living donor (FAS). The least-squares mean values for eGFR were 48.3, 45.7, and 45.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Arms 1 to 3, respectively, versus 41.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Arm 4 (P<0.001). Bas, basiliximab; CS, corticosteroid; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; Tac, tacrolimus.

References

    1. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (2012). CHMP Pharmacokinetics Working Party (PKWP). Questions and answers: positions on specific questions addressed to the Pharmacokinetics Working Party. London. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin.... Accessed May 2012.
    1. Schiff J, Cole E, Cantarovich M. Therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors for the nephrologist. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 374. - PubMed
    1. Wu MJ, Cheng CY, Chen CH, et al. Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 2011; 92: 648. - PubMed
    1. Borra LC, Roodnat JI, Kal JA, et al. High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 2757. - PubMed
    1. Stevenson KS, Glen J, Stevens KK, et al. High tacrolimus intrapatient variability is associated with acute rejection and graft loss (abstract MO-021). Transpl Int 2011. (Suppl 2); 24: 111.

Publication types

Associated data