Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 1;109(7):1813-20.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.504. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

Existing models, but not neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, are prognostic in malignant mesothelioma

Affiliations

Existing models, but not neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, are prognostic in malignant mesothelioma

T M Meniawy et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Recent studies proposed neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic biomarker in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We examined baseline prognostic variables including NLR and the EORTC and CALGB models as predictors of overall survival (OS) in MPM.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 274 consecutive eligible, newly presenting patients with MPM were included. Of these, 159 received chemotherapy, 10 had tri-modality therapy, 2 underwent surgery only and 103 received supportive care alone. Univariate analyses and multivariate Cox models were calculated for OS.

Results: In univariate analysis, poor prognostic factors were: age ≥65 years, nonepithelioid histology, stage III-IV, poor performance status (PS), weight loss, chest pain, low haemoglobin and high platelet count. A baseline NLR≥ 5 did not predict worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.25; P=0.122). On multivariate analysis, age, histology, PS, weight loss, chest pain and platelet count remained significant. The EORTC and CALGB prognostic groups were validated as predictive for OS (HR 1.62; P<0.001 and HR 1.65; P<0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Our findings validate standard prognostic variables and the existing EORTC and CALGB models, but not NLR, at initial diagnosis of MPM. In guiding patient management at diagnosis, it is important to consider multiple baseline variables that jointly predict survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study CONSORT diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Univariate analyses of overall survival according to (A) EORTC prognostic group; (B) CALGB prognostic group; and (C) NLR. All at the time of diagnosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Univariate analyses of overall survival according to normalisation of NLR after one cycle of chemotherapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (mean and s.e.) at the time of diagnosis, prechemotherapy and after one cycle of treatment (n=157).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burton A, Altman DG. Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:4–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrne MJ, Nowak AK. Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:257–260. - PubMed
    1. Cedres S, Montero MA, Martinez P, Martinez A, Rodriguez-Freixinos V, Torrejon D, Gabaldon A, Salcedo M, Ramon YCS, Felip E. Exploratory analysis of activation of PTEN-PI3K pathway and downstream proteins in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) Lung Cancer. 2012;77:192–198. - PubMed
    1. Curran D, Sahmoud T, Therasse P, Van Meerbeeck J, Postmus PE, Giaccone G. Prognostic factors in patients with pleural mesothelioma: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:145–152. - PubMed
    1. Edwards JG, Abrams KR, Leverment JN, Spyt TJ, Waller DA, O'byrne KJ. Prognostic factors for malignant mesothelioma in 142 patients: validation of CALGB and EORTC prognostic scoring systems. Thorax. 2000;55:731–735. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances