Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Nov;37(11):2109-18.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2053-8. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

Xin-die Zhou  1 , Jin Li, Yan Xiong, Li-feng Jiang, Wei-jun Li, Li-dong Wu
Affiliations
Review

Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

Xin-die Zhou et al. Int Orthop. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical use of closed-suction drainage, which aims to reduce postoperative wound haematomas and infection, is common. This study was performed to determine whether closed-suction drainage is safe and effective in promoting wound healing and reducing blood loss and other complications compared with no-drainage in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: The literature search was based on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The data were evaluated using the generic evaluation tool designed by the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group, and then analysed using RevMan 5.0. Twenty randomised controlled trials involving 3,186 patients were included in our analysis.

Results: The results of our meta-analysis indicate that closed-suction drainage reduces the requirement for dressing reinforcement, but increases the rate of homologous blood transfusion. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of infection, blood loss, changes in haemoglobin and haematocrit, functional assessment, or other complications when the drainage group was compared with the no-drainage group.

Conclusions: Our results of the comparison between closed-suction drainage and no drainage in THA have indicated that the routine use of closed-suction drainage for elective total hip arthroplasty may be of more harm than benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of included and excluded studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot diagram showing a summary of the results of the meta-analysis. BN Blood transfusion (no. of patients), BA Blood transfusion (amount of blood per patient)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot diagram showing the influence of closed-suction drainage on wound infection. CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, IV inverse variance, df degrees of freedom, M–H Mantel–Haenszel
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot diagram showing the influence of closed-suction drainage on homologous transfusion
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot diagram showing the influence of closed-suction drainage on reinforcement of the dressing
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 20(12):1121–1124, discussion 1124–1125 - PubMed
    1. Sundaram RO, Parkinson RW. Closed suction drains do not increase the blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):613–616. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0232-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beer KJ, Lombardi AV, Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. The efficacy of suction drains after routine total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(4):584–587. - PubMed
    1. Murphy JP, Scott JE. The effectiveness of suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. J R Soc Med. 1993;86(7):388–389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):35–38. - PubMed

MeSH terms