Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jan;38(1):7-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2075-2. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

Press-fit cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Press-fit cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws

Sheng-Hui Ni et al. Int Orthop. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Cementless acetabular fixation for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely used. The question of using screws for a better primary and secondary acetabular fixation has been discussed in the literature in recent years. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare fixation of acetabular cups with and without screws in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Electronic databases Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library were used to search for randomised controlled trials reported through May 2013 of cementless acetabular fixation for THA with and without screws. Two independent reviewers assessed the trials for eligibility and quality. All related data matching our standards were abstracted for meta-analysis by RevMan 5.0. Evaluation criteria included revisions, migration and osteolysis.

Results: A total of 1,130 THAs enrolled into five trials were included in this meta-analysis. All studies compared fixation of acetabular cups with and without screws, and our pooled data showed no statistical significance between the two surgical methods in revision, migration and osteolysis.

Conclusion: There is no significant difference between cementless acetabular fixation for THA with and without screws in revisions, migration or osteolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: reoperations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: migration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: osteolysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: reoperations
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: migration
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison: with versus without screws. Outcome: osteolysis

Comment in

References

    1. Mulroy RD, Jr, Harris WH. The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(5):757–760. - PubMed
    1. Wroblewski BM. Wear and loosening of the socket in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19(3):627–630. - PubMed
    1. Pulido L, Rachala SR, Cabanela ME. Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):289–298. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadoghi P, Janda W, Agreiter M, Rauf R, Leithner A, Labek G. Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop. 2013;37(6):995–999. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1867-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamada H, Yoshihara Y, Henmi O, Morita M, Shiromoto Y, Kawano T, Kanaji A, Ando K, Nakagawa M, Kosaki N, Fukaya E. Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(2):228–241. doi: 10.1007/s00776-008-1317-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources