Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:173616.
doi: 10.1155/2013/173616. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Comparative analysis of context-dependent mutagenesis in humans and fruit flies

Affiliations

Comparative analysis of context-dependent mutagenesis in humans and fruit flies

Sofya A Medvedeva et al. Int J Genomics. 2013.

Abstract

In general, mutation frequencies are context-dependent: specific adjacent nucleotides may influence the probability to observe a specific type of mutation in a genome. Recently, several hypermutable motifs were identified in the human genome. Namely, there is an increased frequency of T>C mutations in the second position of the words ATTG and ATAG and an increased frequency of A>C mutations in the first position of the word ACAA. Previous studies have also shown that there is a remarkable difference between the mutagenesis of humans and drosophila. While C>T mutations are overrepresented in the CG context in humans (and other vertebrates), this mutation regularity is not observed in Drosophila melanogaster. Such differences in the observed regularities of mutagenesis between representatives of different taxa might reflect differences in the mechanisms involved in mutagenesis. We performed a systematical comparison of mutation regularities within 2-4 bp contexts in Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster and found that the aforementioned contexts are not hypermutable in fruit flies. It seems that most mutation contexts affect mutation rates in a similar manner in H. sapiens and D. melanogaster; however, several important exceptions are noted and discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutation bias and minimal contrasts of mutation contexts in D. melanogaster. Each dot represents a mutation context. Triangles represent the {A>C ∣3, CCA} (as well as complementary contexts) and contexts that had this context as a subcontext. Most dots are in pairs because complementary contexts have similar mutation bias and minimal contrast values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mutation bias and minimal contrast for D. melanogaster and H. sapiens. Each dot represents a mutation context (blue in D. melanogaster, red in H. sapiens). Dots are overlapping and are usually in pairs because complementary contexts have similar mutation bias and minimal contrast values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The difference between H. sapiens and D. melanogaster mutation bias ((a) and (b)) and minimal contrast ((c) and (d)) for 2–4 bp mutation contexts. Each dot represents a mutation context. The X axis represents the contexts minimal contrast values, and the Y axis represents the contexts mutation bias. The minimal contrast and mutation bias values are given for H. sapiens ((a) and (c)) and for D. melanogaster ((b) and (d)), and the color scheme indicates the difference between minimal contrasts. Thus, red dots on (a) and (c) represent contexts that are hypermutable in humans comparing to drosophila, while green dots represent contexts that are hypermutable in D. melanogaster comparing to H. sapiens. This scheme is reversed for (b) and (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baer CF, Miyamoto MM, Denver DR. Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8(8):619–631. - PubMed
    1. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488(7412):471–475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper DN, Krawczak M. Cytosine methylation and the fate of CpG dinucleotides in vertebrates genomes. Human Genetics. 1989;83(2):181–188. - PubMed
    1. Singh ND, Arndt PF, Clark AG, Aquadro CF. Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2009;26(7):1591–1605. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyko F, Ramsahoye BH, Jaenisch R. DNA methylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2000;408(6812):538–540. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources