Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 28:12:72.
doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-72.

Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study

Shamila Shanmugasegaram  1 , Paul Oh, Robert D Reid, Treva McCumber, Sherry L Grace
Affiliations

Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study

Shamila Shanmugasegaram et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Despite greater need, rural inhabitants and individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) are less likely to undertake cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study examined barriers to enrollment and participation in CR among these under-represented groups.

Method: Cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals across Ontario were approached to participate in a larger study. Rurality was assessed by asking participants whether they lived within a 30-minute drive-time from the nearest hospital, with those >30 minutes considered "rural." Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, which included the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. One year later, they were mailed a survey which assessed CR utilization and included the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale. In this cross-sectional study, CR utilization and barriers were compared by rurality and SES.

Results: Of the 1809 (80.4%) retained, there were 215 (11.9%) rural participants, and the mean subjective SES was 6.37 ± 1.76. The mean CRBS score was 2.03 ± 0.73. Rural inhabitants reported attending significantly fewer CR sessions (p < .05), and greater CR barriers overall compared to urban inhabitants (p < .01). Patients of lower subjective SES were significantly less likely to be referred, enroll, and participate in CR, and reported significantly greater barriers to CR compared to their high SES counterparts (p < .01). Prominent barriers for both groups included distance, cost, and transportation problems. These relationships sustained adjustment, and a significant relationship between having undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery and lower barriers was also identified.

Conclusions: The results confirm that rural inhabitants and patients of low SES experience greater barriers to CR utilization when compared to their urban, high SES counterparts. It is time to implement known strategies to overcome these barriers, to achieve equitable and greater use of CR.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Deaton C, Froelicher ES, Wu LH, Ho C, Shishani K, Jaarsma T. The global burden of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(4):S5–S14. - PubMed
    1. Burke LE, Thompson DR, Roos S, van Rijssen A, Verdouw HCLL, Troe E. et al.Global cardiovascular disease prevention: a call to action for nursing: the global burden of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(4):S1–S2. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181ecaacb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone JA, Arthur HM, Suskin N, Austford L, Carlson J, Cupper L, In: Translating knowledge into action. Stone JA, Arthur HM, Suskin N, editor. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CACR); 2009. Canadian guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular disease prevention.
    1. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K. et al.Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;01(7):CD001800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011;162(4):571–584. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types