Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 29:12:73.
doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-73.

Time trends in socio-economic inequalities for women and men with disabilities in Australia: evidence of persisting inequalities

Affiliations

Time trends in socio-economic inequalities for women and men with disabilities in Australia: evidence of persisting inequalities

Anne M Kavanagh et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The socio-economic circumstances and health of people with disabilities has been relatively ignored in public health research, policy and practice in Australia and internationally. This is despite emerging evidence that the socio-economic circumstances that people with disabilities live in contributes to their poorer health. Compared to other developed countries, Australians with disabilities are more likely to live in disadvantaged circumstances, despite being an economically prosperous country; it is therefore likely that the socio-economic disadvantage experienced by Australians with disabilities makes a significant contribution to their health. Despite the importance of this issue Australia does not routinely monitor the socio-economic inequalities for people with disabilities. This paper addresses this gap by describing time trends in socio-economic conditions for Australians with and without disabilities according to the severity of the disability and sex.

Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers were carried out at three time points (1998, 2003 and 2009) to estimate the proportions of women and men (aged between 25 and 64 years) who were living on low incomes, had not completed year 12, were not in paid work, living in private rental and experiencing multiple disadvantage (three or more of the indicators).

Results: People with disabilities are less likely to have completed year 12, be in paid work and are more likely to be living on low incomes and experiencing multiple disadvantage. These conditions worsened with increasing severity of disability and increased or persisted over time, with most of the increase between 1998 and 2003. While women with milder disabilities tended to fare worse than men, the proportions were similar for those with moderate and severe/profound disabilities.

Conclusion: People with disabilities experience high levels of socio-economic disadvantage which has increased or persisted over time and these are likely to translate into poorer health outcomes. A large proportion experience multiple forms of disadvantage, reinforcing the need to tackle disadvantage in a coordinated way across sectors.People with disabilities should be a priority population group for public health. Monitoring socio-economic conditions of people with disabilities is critical for informing policy and assessing the impact of disability reforms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of people experiencing each socio-economic indicator in 1998, 2003 and 2009, by severity and sex. A: proportion not completing year 12 (women); B: proportion not completing year 12 (men); C: proportion living on low income (women); D: proportion living on low income (men); E: proportion not in paid work (women); F: proportion not in paid work (men); G: proportion private rental (women); H: proportion private rental (men).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of people experiencing multiple disadvantage in 1998, 2003 and 2009, by disability severity and sex. A: proportion experiencing multiple disadvantage (women); B: proportion experiencing multiple disadvantage (men).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Logistic regression analysis of the relative odds of experiencing multiple disadvantage by disability severity (compared to those with no disability), by year of survey and sex.

References

    1. Emerson E, Madden R, Graham H, Llewellyn G, Hatton C, Robertson J. The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health. 2011;125:145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Llewellyn G, Emerson E, Honey A, Kariuki M. Left Behind: 2012. A Scorecard on Australia’s Progress in Promoting the Social Inclusion of Young Australians with Disabilities: 2001–2010. University of Sydney: Centre for Disability Research & Policy Faculty of Health Sciences; 2012. unpublished.
    1. Emerson E, Madden R, Robertson J, Graham H, Hatton C, Llewellyn G. Intellectual and physical disability, social mobility, social inclusion and health: background paper for the Marmot Review. Lancaster: Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University; 2009.
    1. Emerson E, Llewellyn G, Honey A, Kariuki M. Lower well-being of young Australian adults with self-reported disability reflects their poorer living conditions rather than health issues. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36:176–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00810.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: keeping on track in the economic downturn - background paper. Stockholm: OECD; 2009.

Publication types