Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;15(8):813-28.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0526-8. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011

Affiliations

How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011

Astrid Kiil et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

This article reviews the quantitative evidence on the behavioural effects of copayment within the health area across a wide range of countries. The review distinguishes itself from previous similar reviews by having a high degree of transparency for the search strategy used to identify the studies included in the review as well as the criteria for inclusion and by including the most recent literature. Empirical studies were identified by performing searches in EconLit. The literature search identified a total of 47 studies of the behavioural effects of copayment. Considering the demand effects, the majority of the reviewed studies found that copayment reduces the use of prescription medicine, consultations with general practitioners and specialists, and ambulatory care, respectively. The literature found no significant effects of copayment on the prevalence of hospitalisations. The empirical evidence on whether copayment for some services, but not for others, causes substitution from the services that are subject to copayment to the 'free' services rather than lower total use is sparse and mixed. Likewise, the health effects of copayment have only been analysed empirically in a limited number of studies, of which half did not find any significant effects in the short term. Finally, the empirical evidence on the distributional consequences of copayment indicates that individuals with low income and in particular need of care generally reduce their use relatively more than the remaining population in consequence of copayment. Hence, it is clear that copayment involves some important economic and political trade-offs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. CMAJ. 2002 Aug 6;167(3):246-52 - PubMed
    1. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Mar;9(1):83-112 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 2003 Nov;22(6):881-913 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Jun;11(3):331-41 - PubMed
    1. Med Care Res Rev. 2001 Jun;58(2):131-61 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources