Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3.

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Frederieke G Schaafsma  1 , Karyn Whelan, Allard J van der Beek, Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek, Anneli Ojajärvi, Jos H Verbeek
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Frederieke G Schaafsma et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy aims to improve work status for workers on sick leave due to back pain. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review (originally titled 'Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain') first published in 2003, updated in 2010, and updated again in 2013.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy in reducing time lost from work and improving work status for workers with back pain. Further, to assess which aspects of physical conditioning are related to a faster return to work for workers with back pain.

Search methods: We searched the following databases to March 2012: CENTRAL, MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), CINAHL (from 1982), PsycINFO (from 1967), and PEDro.

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs that studied workers with work disability related to back pain and who were included in physical conditioning programmes.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

Main results: We included 41 articles reporting on 25 RCTs with 4404 participants. Risk of bias was low in 16 studies.Three studies involved workers with acute back pain, eight studies workers with subacute back pain, and 14 studies workers with chronic back pain.In 14 studies, physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy was compared to usual care. The physical conditioning mostly consisted of graded activity with work-related exercises aimed at increasing back strength and flexibility, together with a set date for return to work. The programmes were divided into a light version with a maximum of five sessions, or an intense version with more than five sessions up to full time or as inpatient treatment.For acute back pain, there was low quality evidence that both light and intense physical conditioning programmes made little or no difference in sickness absence duration compared with care as usual at three to 12 months follow-up (3 studies with 340 workers).For subacute back pain, the evidence on the effectiveness of intense physical conditioning combined with care as usual compared to usual care alone was conflicting (four studies with 395 workers). However, subgroup analysis showed low quality evidence that if the intervention was executed at the workplace, or included a workplace visit, it may have reduced sickness absence duration at 12 months follow-up (3 studies with 283 workers; SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.18).For chronic back pain, there was low quality evidence that physical conditioning as part of integrated care management in addition to usual care may have reduced sickness absence days compared to usual care at 12 months follow-up (1 study, 134 workers; SMD -4.42, 95% CI -5.06 to -3.79). What part of the integrated care management was most effective remained unclear. There was moderate quality evidence that intense physical conditioning probably reduced sickness absence duration only slightly compared with usual care at 12 months follow-up (5 studies, 1093 workers; SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.03).Physical conditioning compared to exercise therapy showed conflicting results for workers with subacute and chronic back pain. Cognitive behavioural therapy was probably not superior to physical conditioning as an alternative or in addition to physical conditioning.

Authors' conclusions: The effectiveness of physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy in reducing sick leave for workers with back pain, compared to usual care or exercise therapy, remains uncertain. For workers with acute back pain, physical conditioning may have no effect on sickness absence duration. There is conflicting evidence regarding the reduction of sickness absence duration with intense physical conditioning versus usual care for workers with subacute back pain. It may be that including workplace visits or execution of the intervention at the workplace is the component that renders a physical conditioning programme effective. For workers with chronic back pain physical conditioning has a small effect on reducing sick leave compared to care as usual after 12 months follow-up. To what extent physical conditioning as part of integrated care management may alter the effect on sick leave for workers with chronic back pain needs further research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

1
1
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 7 Intense PC + CaU versus CaU only, subacute pain, outcome: 7.3 Time to return‐to‐work.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 11 Intense PC versus multidisciplinary exercise treatment, subacute pain, outcome: 11.1 Proportion off work short‐term follow‐up.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: Intense PCP versus care as usual for workers with chronic back pain, outcome: Time to return‐to‐work at long‐term follow‐up
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: Intense PCP versus exercise programme for workers with chronic back pain, outcome: Time to return‐to‐work at intermediate‐term follow‐up.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: Intense PCP versus intense PCP with CBT for workers with chronic back pain, outcome: Time to return‐to‐work at long‐term follow‐up.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Light physical conditioning programme (PCP) + backbook versus backbook intervention only, acute pain, Outcome 1 Proportion off work.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Light physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus care as usual (CaU), acute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work long term follow up.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus care as usual (CaU), acute pain, Outcome 1 Proportion off work long term follow up.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Light physical conditioning programme (PCP) + care as usual (CaU) versus CaU, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Light physical conditioning programme (PCP) + brief clinical intervention (CI) versus brief CI only, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) + care as usual (CaU) versus CaU only, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) + care as usual (CaU) versus CaU only, subacute pain, Outcome 2 Time to return to work very long term follow up.
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus light PCP, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus cognitive intervention, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work short term follow up.
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus care as usual (CaU), subacute pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
10.1
10.1. Analysis
Comparison 10 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus multidisciplinary exercise treatment, subacute pain, Outcome 1 Proportion off work short term follow up.
11.1
11.1. Analysis
Comparison 11 Light physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus care as usual (CaU), chronic pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
12.1
12.1. Analysis
Comparison 12 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) + care as usual (CaU) versus CaU only, chronic pain, Outcome 1 Time to Return to Work.
13.1
13.1. Analysis
Comparison 13 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus care as usual (CaU), chronic pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
14.1
14.1. Analysis
Comparison 14 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus exercise program, chronic pain, Outcome 1 Proportion off work short term follow up.
14.2
14.2. Analysis
Comparison 14 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus exercise program, chronic pain, Outcome 2 Time to return to work.
15.1
15.1. Analysis
Comparison 15 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus intense PCP + cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), chronic pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
16.1
16.1. Analysis
Comparison 16 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for workers with chronic back pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
17.1
17.1. Analysis
Comparison 17 Intense physical conditioning programme (PCP) versus light PCP, chronic back pain, Outcome 1 Time to return to work.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Altmaier 1992 {published data only}
    1. Altmaier EM, Lehmann TR, Russell DW, Weinstein JN, Kao CH. The effectiveness of psychological interventions for the rehabilitation of low back pain: a randomised controlled trial evaluation. Pain 1992;49:329‐35. - PubMed
Bendix 1996 {published data only}
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Hæstrup C, Busch E. A prospective, randomized 5‐year follow‐up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. European Spine Journal 1998;7:111‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Labriola M, Bœkgaard. Functional Restoration for Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine 1998;23(6):717‐25. - PubMed
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Vaegter K, Busch E, Kirkbak S, Ostenfeld S. Intensive work rehabilitation [Intensiv tvaerfaglig rygbehandling]. Videnskab og Praksis 1994;156(16):2388‐95. - PubMed
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Vægter K, Lind C, Frølund L, Holm L. Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized, prospective study. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 1996;63(1):62‐9. - PubMed
Bendix 1997 {published data only}
    1. Bendix A, Bendix T, Labriola M, Bœkgaard P. Functional restoration for chronic low back pain/ two‐year follow‐up of two randomized clinical trials. Spine 1998;23(6):717‐25. - PubMed
    1. Bendix AE, Bendix T, Hæstrup C, Busch E. A prospective, randomized 5‐year follow‐up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. European Spine Journal 1998;7:111‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Lund C, Kirkbak S, Ostenfeld S. Comparison of three intensive programs for chronic low back pain patients: a prospective, randomized, observer‐blinded study with one year follow‐up. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1997;29:81‐9. - PubMed
Bendix 2000 {published data only}
    1. Bendix T, Bendix A, Labriola M, Hæstrup C, Ebbehøj N. Functional restoration versus outpatient physical training in chronic low back pain. Spine 2000;25(19):2494‐500. - PubMed
Bethge 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bethge M, Herbold D, Jacobi C. Work status and health‐related quality of life following multimodal work hardening: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2011;24:161‐72. - PubMed
Corey 1996 {published data only}
    1. Corey DT, Koepfler LE, Etlin D, Day HI. A limited functional restoration program for injured workers: A randomised trial. Journal of Ocupational Rehabilitation 1996;6(4):239‐49. - PubMed
Faas 1995 {published data only}
    1. Faas A, Eijk J Th M, Chavannes AW, Gubbels JW. A randomised trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: Efficacy on sickness absence. Spine 1995;20(8):941‐7. - PubMed
Gatchel 2003 {published data only}
    1. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Noe C, Gardea M, Pulliam C, Thompson J. Treatment‐ and cost‐effectiveness of early intervention for acute low‐back pain patients: A one‐year prospective study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2003;13(1):1‐9. - PubMed
Heymans 2006 {published data only}
    1. Heymans MW, Vet HCW, Bonger PM, Knol DL, Koes BW, Mechelen W. The effectiveness of high‐intensity versus low‐intensity back schools in an occupational setting. Spine 2006;31(10):1075‐82. - PubMed
Jensen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Jensen IB, Bergström G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L. A 3‐year follow‐up of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for back and neck pain. Pain 2005;115:273‐83. - PubMed
    1. Jensen IB, Bergström G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L, Nygren ÅL. A randomized controlled component analysis of a behavioral medicine rehabilitation program for chronic spinal pain: are the effects dependent on gender. Pain 2001;91:65‐78. - PubMed
Jensen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Jensen C, Jensen OK, Christiansen DH, Nielsen CV. One‐year follow‐up in employees sick‐listed because of low back pain. Spine 2011;36(15):1180‐9. - PubMed
Karjalainen 2003 {published data only}
    1. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mutanen P, Roine R, Hurri H, Pohjolainen T. Mini‐intervention for subacute low back pain. Spine 2004;29(10):1069‐76. - PubMed
    1. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Mutanen P, Rissanen P, et al. Mini‐intervention for subacute low back pain. Spine 2003;28(6):533‐41. - PubMed
Kool 2005 {published data only}
    1. Kool J, Bachmann S, Oesch P, Knuesel O, Ambergen T, Bie R, Brandt P. Function‐centered rehabilitation increases work days in patients with nonacute nonspecific low back pain: 1‐Year results from a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;88(9):1089‐94. - PubMed
    1. Kool JP, Oesch PR, Backmann S, Knuesel O, Dierkes JG, Russo M, Bie RA, Brandt PA. Increasing days at work using function‐centered rehabilitation in nonacute nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005;86(5):857‐64. - PubMed
Lambeek 2010 {published data only}
    1. Lambeek LC, Mechelen W, Knol DL, Louisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ 2010;340:c1035. - PMC - PubMed
Lindstrom 1992 {published data only}
    1. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson L‐E, Nachemson A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomised prospective clinical study with a behavioural approach. Spine 1992;17(6):641‐52. - PubMed
    1. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Fordyce WE, Nachemson AL. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant‐conditioning behavioral approach. Physical Therapy 1992;72(4):279‐90. - PubMed
    1. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Nachemson A. Physical performance, pain, pain behavior and subjective disability in patients with subacute low back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1995;27(3):153‐60. - PubMed
Loisel 1997 {published data only}
    1. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, et al. A population based, randomised clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997;22(24):2911‐8. - PubMed
    1. Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand M‐J, Champagne F, Stock S, et al. Cost‐benefit and cost‐effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002;59(12):807‐15. - PMC - PubMed
Meyer 2005 {published data only}
    1. Meyer K, Fransen J, Huwiler H, Uebelhart D, Klipstein A. Feasibility and results of a randomised pilot‐study of a work rehabilitation programme. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2005;18:67‐78.
Mitchell 1994 {published data only}
    1. Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. The functional restoration approach to the treatment of chronic pain in patients with soft tissue and back injuries. Spine 1994;19(6):633‐42. - PubMed
Roche 2007 {published data only}
    1. Jousset N, Fanello S, Bontoux L, Dubus V, Billabert C, Vielle B, et al. Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine 2004;29(5):487‐94. - PubMed
    1. Roche G, Ponthieux A, Parot‐Shinkel E, Jousset N, Bontoux L, Dubus V, et al. Comparison of a functional restoration program with active individual physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;88:1229‐35. - PubMed
    1. Roche‐Leboucher G, Petit‐Lemanac'h A, Bontoux L, Dubus‐Bausière V, Parot‐Shinkel E, Fanello S, et al. Multidisciplinary intensive functional restoration versus outpatient active physicotherapy in chronic low back pain. Spine 2011;36(26):2235‐42. - PubMed
Skouen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EMH, Ursin H. Relative cost‐effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long‐term sick leave. Spine 2002;27(9):901‐10. - PubMed
Staal 2004 {published data only}
    1. Hlobil H, Staal JB, Twisk J, Köke A, Ariëns G, Smid T, et al. The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupational health on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12‐month results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2005;15(4):569‐80. - PubMed
    1. Hlobil H, Uegaki K, Staal JB, Bruyne MC, Smid T, Mechelen W. Substantial sick‐leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non‐specific sub‐acute low back pain. European Spine Journal 2007;16:919‐24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Staal JB, Hlobil H, Twisk JWR, Smid T, Köke AJA, Mechelen W. Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004;140:142‐3. - PubMed
Steenstra 2006 {published data only}
    1. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, Vet HCW, Knol DL, Loisel P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: Graded activity or workplace intervention or both?. Spine 2007;32(3):291‐8. - PubMed
    1. Steenstra IA, Anema JR, Bongers PM, Vet HCW, Knol DL, Mechelen W. The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2006;63:718‐25. - PMC - PubMed
Storheim 2003 {published data only}
    1. Storheim K, Brox JI, Holm I, Koller AK, Bø K. Intensive group training versus cognitive intervention in sub‐acute low back pain: short‐term results of a single‐blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003;35:132‐40. - PubMed
van den Hout 2003 {published data only}
    1. Hout JHC, Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PHTG, Zijlema JHL, WIjnen JAG. Secondary prevention of work‐related disability in nonspecific low back pain: Does problem‐solving therapy help? A randomized clinical trial. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2003;19(2):87‐96. - PubMed
Wright 2005 {published data only}
    1. Wright A, Lloyd‐Davies A, Williams S, Ellis R, Strike P. Individual active treatment combined with group exercise for acute and subacute low back pain. Spine 2005;30(11):1235‐41. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Alaranta 1994 {published data only}
    1. Alaranta H, Rytokoski U, Rissanen A, Talo S, Ronnemaa T, Puukka P, et al. Intensive physical and psychosocial training program for patients with chronic low back pain. A controlled trial. Spine 1994;19(12):1339‐49. - PubMed
Aure 2003 {published data only}
    1. Aure OF, Hilsen JH, Vasseljen O. Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2003;28(6):525‐32. - PubMed
Bentsen 1997 {published data only}
    1. Bentsen H, Lindgarde F, Manthorpe R. The effect of dynamic strength back exercise and/or a home training program in 57‐old women with chronic back pain. Results of a prospective randomized study with a 3 year follow‐up period. Spine 1997;22(13):1494‐500. - PubMed
Bültmann 2009 {published data only}
    1. Bültmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, Hansen CL, Lund T, Kilsgaard J. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2009;19:81‐93. - PubMed
Dahl 2001 {published data only}
    1. Dahl J, Nilsson A. Evaluation of a randomized preventive behavioural medicine work site intervention for public health workers at risk for developing chronic pain. European Journal of Pain 2001;5(4):421‐32. - PubMed
Dettori 1995 {published data only}
    1. Dettori JR, Bullock SH, Sutlive TG, Franklin RJ, Patience T. The effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises and their associated postures in patients with acute low back pain. Spine 1995;20(21):2303‐12. - PubMed
Friedrich 1998 {published data only}
    1. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I. Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disablity of patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998;79:475‐87. - PubMed
Hagen 2000 {published data only}
    1. Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long‐term sick leave for low back pain. Spine 2000;25(15):1973‐6. - PubMed
Hansen 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hansen FR, Bendix T, Skov P, Jensen CV, Kristensen JH, Krohn L, et al. Intensive, dynamic back muscle exercises, conventional physiotherapy, or placebo‐control treatment of low back pain. Spine 1993;18(1):98‐108. - PubMed
Kellett 1991 {published data only}
    1. Kellett KM, Kellett DA, Nordholm LA. Effects of an exercise program on sick leave due to back pain. Physical Therapy 1991;71(4):283‐93. - PubMed
Linton 2005 {published data only}
    1. Linton S, Boersma K, Jansson M, Svärd L, Botvalde M. The effects of cognitive‐behavioural and physical therapy preventive interventions on pain‐related sick leave: A randomized controlled trial. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2005;21(2):109‐19. - PubMed
Malmivaara 1995 {published data only}
    1. Malmivaraa A, Hakkinen UTA, Heinrichs M‐L, Koskenniemi L, Kuosma E, Lappi S, et al. The treatment of acute low back pain‐ bed rest, exercises or ordinary activity?. The New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(6):351‐5. - PubMed
Moffett 1999 {published data only}
    1. Moffett JK, Torgerson D, Bell‐Syer S, Jackson D, Llewlyn‐Philips H, Farrin A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs and preferences. BMJ 1999;319:279‐83. - PMC - PubMed
Niemisto 2003 {published data only}
    1. Niemistö L, Lahtinen‐Suopanki T, Rissanen P, Lindgren K, Sarna S, Hurri H. A randomized trial of combined manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation compared to physician consultation alone for chronic low back pain. Spine 2003;28(19):2185‐91. - PubMed
Rantonen 2012 {published data only}
    1. Rantonen J, Luoto S, Vehtari A, Hupli M, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Taimela S. The effectiveness of two active interventions compared to self‐care advice in employees with non‐acute low back symptoms: a randomised controlled trial with a 4‐year follow‐up in the occupational health setting. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012;69:12‐20. - PubMed
Schiltenwolf 2006 {published data only}
    1. Schiltenwolf M, Buchner M. Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. European Spine Journal 2006;15(7):1083‐92. - PMC - PubMed
Seferlis 1998 {published data only}
    1. Seferlis T, Nemeth G, Carlsson AM, Girllstrom P. Conservative treatment in patients sick listed for acute low back pain: a prospective randomised study with 12 months' follow up. European Spine Journal 1998;7:461‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Torstensen 1998 {published data only}
    1. Torstensen TA, Ljunggren AE, Meen HD, Odland E, Mowinckel P, Geijerstam S. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self‐exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A pragmatic, randomised, single‐blinded, controlled trial with 1 year follow‐up. Spine 1998;23(23):2616‐24. - PubMed
Whitfill 2010 {published data only}
    1. Whitfill T, Haggard R, Bierner SM, Pransky G, Hassett RG, Gatchel RJ. Early intervention options for acute low back pain patients: a randomized clinical trial with one‐year follow‐up outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2010;20:256‐63. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Henchoz 2010 {published data only}
    1. Henchoz Y, Goumoënsa P, So AKL, Paillex R. Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation versusoutpatient physiotherapy for non‐specific lowback pain: randomised controlled trial. Swiss Medical Weekly 2010;140:w13133. - PubMed
Jensen 2012 {published data only}
    1. Jensen C, Jensen OK, Nielsen CV. Sustainability of return to work in sick‐listed employees with low‐back pain. Two‐year follow‐up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012;13:156. - PMC - PubMed
Vora 2012 {published data only}
    1. Vora RN, Barron BA, Almudevar A, Utell MJ. Work‐related chronic low back pain‐return‐to‐work outcomes after referral to interventional pain and spine clinics. Spine 2012;37(20):1282‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

Anema 2007
    1. Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, Vet HCW, Knol DL, Loisel P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: Graded activity or workplace intervention or both?. Spine 2007;32(3):291‐8. - PubMed
Anema 2009
    1. Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return‐to‐work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2009;19:419‐23. - PMC - PubMed
Atkins 2004
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck‐Ytter Y, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490. - PMC - PubMed
Boutron 2005
    1. Boutron I, Moher D, Tugwell P, Giraudeau B, Poiraudeau S, Nizard R, et al. A checklist to evaluate a report of a non pharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58:1233‐40. - PubMed
Carroll 2010
    1. Carroll C, Rick J, Cameron J, Hillage J. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long‐term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation 2010;32(8):607‐21. - PubMed
Chinn 2000
    1. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2000;19(22):3127‐31. - PubMed
Chinn 2002
    1. Chinn S. Comparing and combining studies of bronchial responsiveness. Thorax 2002;57(5):393‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Fordyce 1976
    1. Fordyce WE. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. New York: Raven Press, 1976.
Furlan 2009
    1. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Tulder M, Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2009;34(18):1929‐41. - PubMed
Guzman 2001
    1. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ 2001;322:1511‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Guzman 2002
    1. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary bio‐psycho‐social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963] - DOI - PubMed
Hayden 2005
    1. Hayden J, Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise treatment for treatment of non‐specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Heymans 2005
    1. Heymans M, Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for non‐specific low‐back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000261] - DOI - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. Available from: www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Jousset 2004
    1. Jousset N, Fanello S, Bontoux L, Dubus V, Billabert C, Vielle B, et al. Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine 2004;29(5):487‐94. - PubMed
Karjalainen 2000
    1. Karjalainen KA, Malmivaara A, Tulder MW, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low‐back pain among working age adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002193; Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Van Tulder M, Roine R, Juahiainen M, Koes B. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working‐age adults. Spine 2001;26(3):262‐9.] - DOI - PubMed
Krause 1998
    1. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1998;8(2):113‐39.
Lechner 1994
    1. Lechner DE. Work hardening and work conditioning interventions: Do they affect disability?. Physical Therapy 1994;74(4):471‐93. - PubMed
Loisel 2005
    1. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2005;15(4):507‐24. - PubMed
Ostelo 2000
    1. Ostelo RWJG, Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ, Morley S, Assendelft WJJ. Behavioural treatment for chronic low‐back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002014] - DOI - PubMed
Poiraudeau 2007
    1. Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M. Functional restoration programs for low back pain: a systematic review. Annales de Réadaptation et de Medicine Physique 2007;50:425‐9. - PubMed
Schonstein 1999
    1. Schonstein E, Kenny DT. Rethinking functional capacity evaluations. Proceedings of the Moving in on Occupational Injury; 1999 June 2‐5; Cairns, Australia. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1999.
Teasell 1996
    1. Teasell RW, Harth M. Functional restoration. Returning patients with chronic low back pain to work ‐ revolution or fad? [see comments]. Spine 1996;21(7):844‐7. - PubMed
van Oostrom 2009
    1. Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, Vet HCW, Franche RL, Schonstein E, Loisel P, et al. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955] - DOI - PubMed
van Tulder 2003
    1. Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28(12):1290‐9. - PubMed
Voaklander 1995
    1. Voaklander DC, Beaulne AP, Lessard RA. Factors related to outcome following a work hardening program. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1995;5(2):71‐85. - PubMed
Waddell 1999
    1. Waddell G, Burton K. Evidence review. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work ‐ Principal recommendations. Faculty of Occupational Medicine, London 2000. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Schaafsma 2010
    1. Schaafsma FG, Schonstein E, Whelan KM, Ulvestad E, Kenny DT, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning programs for improving work outcomes in workers with back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822] - DOI - PubMed
Schaafsma 2011
    1. Schaafsma FG, Schonstein E, Ojajärvi A, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning programs for improving work outcomes among workers with back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2011;37(1):1‐5. - PubMed
Schonstein 2003
    1. Schonstein E, Kenny DT, Keating JL, Koes BW. Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822] - DOI - PubMed
Schonstein 2003a
    1. Schonstein E, Kenny D, Keating J, Koes B, Herbert RD. Physical conditioning programs for workers with back and neck pain: a Cochrane systematic review. Spine 2003;28(19):E391‐5. - PubMed

Publication types