Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:7:189-98.
doi: 10.2147/BTT.S34942. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

Treatment and management of myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors

Affiliations

Treatment and management of myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors

Clodagh Keohane et al. Biologics. 2013.

Erratum in

  • Biologics. 2013;7:231

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) can present as a primary disorder or evolve from polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) to post-PV MF or post-ET MF, respectively. MF is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, leukoerythroblastosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and a collection of debilitating symptoms. Until recently, the therapeutic options for patients with MF consisted of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT), the use of cytoreductive agents (ie, hydroxyurea), splenectomy and splenic irradiation for treatment of splenomegaly, and management of anemia with transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), androgens, and immunomodulatory agents. However, with increased understanding of the pathogenesis of MF resulting from dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK) signaling, new targeted JAK inhibitor therapies, such as ruxolitinib, are now available. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical features of MF, discuss the use and future of JAK inhibitors, reassess when and how to use conventional MF treatments in the context of JAK inhibitors, and provide a perspective on the future of MF treatment.

Keywords: JAK inhibitor; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in (A) COMFORT-I and (B) COMFORT-II with 24 months of follow-up. Note: aP-values and CIs are unadjusted for repeat analyses. Republished with permission of American Society of Hematology; High Wire Press, from A comprehensive review and analysis of the effect of ruxolitinib therapy on the survival of patients with myelofibrosis. Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R. Blood. 121(24):2013; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; BAT, best available therapy; COMFORT, COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment.

References

    1. Mesa RA, Green A, Barosi G, Verstovsek S, Vardiman J, Gale RP. MPN-associated myelofibrosis (MPN-MF) Leuk Res. 2011;35(1):12–13. - PubMed
    1. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113(13):2895–2901. - PubMed
    1. Barosi G, Rosti V, Vannucchi AM. Therapeutic approaches in myelofibrosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(10):1597–1611. - PubMed
    1. James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic JP, et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005;434(7037):1144–1148. - PubMed
    1. Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(17):1779–1790. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources