Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism
- PMID: 23991658
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306638
Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 23;370(4):390
Abstract
Background: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.
Results: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, which occurred in 130 patients in the edoxaban group (3.2%) and 146 patients in the warfarin group (3.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.13; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The safety outcome occurred in 349 patients (8.5%) in the edoxaban group and 423 patients (10.3%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.004 for superiority). The rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. A total of 938 patients with pulmonary embolism had right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels; the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism in this subgroup was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.2% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.98).
Conclusions: Edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was noninferior to high-quality standard therapy and caused significantly less bleeding in a broad spectrum of patients with venous thromboembolism, including those with severe pulmonary embolism. (Funded by Daiichi-Sankyo; Hokusai-VTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00986154.).
Comment in
-
Venous thromboembolism: Edoxaban: as effective and safer than warfarin in VTE.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Nov;10(11):614. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.145. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24042227 No abstract available.
-
Edoxaban versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):80-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313883. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24382069 No abstract available.
-
Edoxaban versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313883. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 24382070 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism, with less bleeding.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):JC4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-2-201401210-02004. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24445714 No abstract available.
-
In intracranial artery stenosis, adding angioplasty and stenting to medical therapy increased stroke or death.Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):JC4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-160-6-201403180-02004. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24638182 No abstract available.
-
Which oral anticoagulant to use: factor Xa inhibitor or thrombin inhibitor?Natl Med J India. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):221-2. Natl Med J India. 2013. PMID: 24758448 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical