Influence of a regional centralised upper gastrointestinal cancer service model on patient safety, quality of care and survival

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of a reconfigured centralised upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer service model, allied to an enhanced recovery programme, when compared with historical controls in a UK cancer network.

Materials and methods: Details of 606 consecutive patients diagnosed with UGI cancer were collected prospectively and outcomes before (n = 251) and after (n = 355) centralisation compared. Primary outcome measures were rates of curative treatment intent, operative morbidity, length of hospital stay and survival.

Results: The rate of curative treatment intent increased from 21 to 36% after centralisation (P < 0.0001). Operative morbidity (mortality) and length of hospital stay before and after centralisation were 40% (2.5%) and 16 days, compared with 45% (2.4%) and 13 days, respectively (P = 0.024). The median and 1 year survival (all patients) improved from 8.7 months and 39.0% to 10.8 months and 46.8%, respectively, after centralisation (P = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.894, 95% confidence interval 0.743-4.781, P < 0.0001), centralisation (hazard ratio 0.809, 95% confidence interval 0.668-0.979, P = 0.03) and overall radiological TNM stage (hazard ratio 3.905, 95% confidence interval 1.413-11.270, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with survival.

Conclusion: These outcomes confirm the patient safety, quality of care and survival improvements achievable by compliance with National Health Service Improving Outcomes Guidance.

Keywords: Centralisation; gastric cancer; oesophageal cancer; surgery.