Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 30;3(8):e003291.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003291.

Educational interventions to improve prescribing competency: a systematic review

Gritta Kamarudin  1 , Jonathan Penm, Betty Chaar, Rebekah Moles
Affiliations

Educational interventions to improve prescribing competency: a systematic review

Gritta Kamarudin et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To review the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing and identify educational methods that improve prescribing competency in both medical and non-medical prescribers.

Design: A systematic review was conducted. The databases Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for articles in English published between January 1990 and July 2013.

Setting: Primary and secondary care.

Participants: Medical and non-medical prescribers.

Intervention: Education-based interventions to aid improvement in prescribing competency.

Primary outcome: Improvements in prescribing competency (knows how) or performance (shows how) as defined by Miller's competency model. This was primarily demonstrated through prescribing examinations, changes in prescribing habits or adherence to guidelines.

Results: A total of 47 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Studies were categorised by their method of assessment, with 20 studies assessing prescribing competence and 27 assessing prescribing performance. A wide variety of educational interventions were employed, with different outcome measures and methods of assessments. In particular, six studies demonstrated that specific prescribing training using the WHO Guide to Good Prescribing increased prescribing competency in a wide variety of settings. Continuing medical education in the form of academic detailing and personalised prescriber feedback also yielded positive results. Only four studies evaluated educational interventions targeted at non-medical prescribers, highlighting that further research is needed in this area.

Conclusions: A broad range of educational interventions have been conducted to improve prescribing competency. The WHO Guide to Good Prescribing has the largest body of evidence to support its use and is a promising model for the design of targeted prescribing courses. There is a need for further development and evaluation of educational methods for non-medical prescribers.

Keywords: EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; THERAPEUTICS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Miller's framework for clinical assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of search strategy and study selection based on PRISMA guidelines.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hanes C, Bajorek B. Pharmacist prescribing: is Australia behind the times? Aust J Pharm 2004;85:680–1
    1. Aronson JK. A prescription for better prescribing. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006;61:487–91 - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vries TP, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, et al. Guide to good prescribing. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1994
    1. Bryony Dean F, Vincent C, Schachter M, et al. The incidence of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: an overview of the research methods. Drug Saf 2005;28:891–900 - PubMed
    1. Coombes ID, Stowasser DA, Coombes JA, et al. Why do interns make prescribing errors? A qualitative study. Med J Aust 2008;188:89–94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources