Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Fall;64(4):397-413.
doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-24.

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Affiliations

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Ted Stevenson et al. Physiother Can. 2012 Fall.

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize the existing literature examining constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), relative to dose-matched control interventions, for upper-limb (UL) dysfunction in adult survivors of stroke.

Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, NARIC/CIRRIE-Rehabdata, PEDro, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to February 2011. Trial quality was described using the PEDro scale. The findings were summarized with meta-analysis.

Results: For the 22 trials identified, the mean (SD) PEDro score was 6.4 (1.2). Meta-analysis showed CIMT to be superior to dose-matched interventions based on indicators of UL motor capacity (15 trials, n=432; standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.47, 95% CI, 0.27-0.66) and UL ability (14 trials, n=352; SMD=0.80, 95% CI, 0.57-1.02); Functional Independence Measure scores (6 trials, n=182; mean difference [MD]=5.05, 95% CI, 2.23-7.87); and Motor Activity Log scores (Amount of Use: 12 trials, n=318; MD=1.05, 95% CI, 0.85-1.24; Quality of Movement: 11 trials, n=330; MD=0.89, 95% CI, 0.69-1.08).

Conclusions: Compared to control interventions of equal duration and dose, CIMT produced greater improvements in a variety of indicators of UL function in adult survivors of a stroke with residual movement of their upper limb.

Objectif : Faire la synthèse de la littérature existante traitant de la thérapie par contrainte induite (TCI) par rapport aux interventions de contrôle avec dosage équivalent dans les cas de dysfonctions des membres supérieurs chez les adultes ayant survécu à un accident vasculaire cérébral. Méthode : Une recherche a été effectuée dans CINAHL, dans la bibliothèque de Cochrane, dans Embase, NARIC/CIRRIE—Rehabdata, PEDro, PubMed, Scopus, et Web of Science depuis leur mise en ligne jusqu'en février 2011. La qualité des recherches a été évaluée à l'aide de l'échelle PEDro. Les conclusions ont été résumées à l'aide d'une méta-analyse. Résultats : Au total, 22 essais ont été répertoriés; la moyenne de leur cote à l'échelle PEDro était de 6,4 (SD1 de 0,2). La méta-analyse a révélé que la TCI est supérieure aux interventions de contrôle avec dosage équivalent pour les indicateurs de capacité motrice des membres supérieurs (15 essais, n=432; MDS=0,47; 95%IC, 0,27–0,66); capacité des membres supérieurs (14 essais, n=352; MDS=0,80; 95%IC, 0,57–1,02); mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle [Functional Independence Measure] (6 essais, n=182; DM=5,05; 95%IC, 2,23–7,87); et score du journal de l'activité motrice [Motor Activity Log] (quantité d'utilisation : 12 essais, n=318; DM=1,05; 95%IC, 0,85–1,24; qualité du mouvement : 11 essais, n=330; DM=0,89; 95%IC 0,69–1,08). Conclusions : Si on la compare aux interventions de contrôle de durée et avec dosage équivalents, la TCI suscite de plus grandes améliorations dans une variété d'indicateurs de la fonction des membres supérieurs chez les adultes ayant survécu à un AVC avec mouvement résiduel de leurs membres supérieurs.

Keywords: constraint-induced movement therapy; rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing accounting of studies through the search process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of findings from studies comparing CIMT to dose-matched control intervention for upper-limb motor capacity outcomes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of findings from studies comparing the effect of CIMT and dose-matched control intervention on indicators of upper-limb ability.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot summarizing findings from studies comparing CIMT to dose-matched control intervention for Functional Independence Measure scores immediately after completion of the intervention.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of findings from trials comparing the effects of CIMT and dose-matched control intervention on performance on the Amount of Use sub-scale of the Motor Activity Log.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of findings from trials comparing the effects of CIMT and dose-matched control intervention on performance on the Quality of Movement sub-scale of the Motor Activity Log.

References

    1. Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):257–68. Medline:17039224. - PubMed
    1. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61(2):281–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281. Medline:8169577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(4):221–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70003-9. Medline:16321129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjorklund A, Fecht A. The effectiveness of constraint-induced therapy as a stroke intervention: a meta-analysis. Occup Ther Health Care. 2006;20(2):31–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J003v20n02_03. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonaiuti D, Rebasti L, Sioli P. The constraint induced movement therapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the adult stroke patients. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(2):139–46. Medline:17525700. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources