Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;7(7):1495-7.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5435.3172. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

The Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An in-Vitro Comparative Study

Affiliations

The Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An in-Vitro Comparative Study

Y G Reddy et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: This study has compared the Shear Bond Strengths (SBSs) of ceramic brackets and metal brackets.

Materials and method: Forty freshly extracted, human maxillary first premolars were selected for bonding. They were equally bonded with ceramic brackets (Transcend series 6000) and metal brackets (Mini Dynalock Straight wire brackets). A no - mix orthodontic adhesive system was used. Their shear bond strengths were measured by using the Instron universal machine.

Results: The mean bond strength of the ceramic brackets was 20.68 ± 3.89 Mpa and that of the metal brackets was 12.15 ± 1.32 MPa.

Conclusion: The shear bond strength of the ceramic brackets was found to be superior than that of the metal brackets.

Keywords: Bracket; Ceramic; Metal; Shear bond.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Brackets used in study. Group A: Transcend 6000 series ceramic bracket Group B: Mini Dynalock Straight wire metal brackets
[Table/Fig-2]:
[Table/Fig-2]:
Mounting of specimen into jig
[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Instron universal machine to measure shear bond strength
[Table/Fig-7]:
[Table/Fig-7]:
Shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel bracke

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Esthetic orthodontic appliances and bonding concerns for adults. Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jan;41(1):89–109. - PubMed
    1. Birnie D. Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:71–75. - PubMed
    1. Bordeaux JM, Moore RN, Bagby MD. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Jun;105(6):552–60. - PubMed
    1. Bishara SE, Feht DE. Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review. Semin Orthod. 1997 Sept;3(3):178–88. - PubMed
    1. Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1988 Feb;22(2):82–88. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources