Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Sep;88(9):920-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.003.

Software-guided insulin dosing: tight glycemic control and decreased glycemic derangements in critically ill patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Software-guided insulin dosing: tight glycemic control and decreased glycemic derangements in critically ill patients

Nicole M Saur et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether glycemic derangements are more effectively controlled using software-guided insulin dosing compared with paper-based protocols.

Patients and methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive critically ill patients treated in a tertiary hospital surgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1 and June 30, 2008, and between January 1 and September 30, 2009. Paper-based protocol insulin dosing was evaluated as a baseline during the first period, followed by software-guided insulin dosing in the second period. We compared glycemic metrics related to hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability during the 2 periods.

Results: We treated 110 patients by the paper-based protocol and 87 by the software-guided protocol during the before and after periods, respectively. The mean ICU admission blood glucose (BG) level was higher in patients receiving software-guided intensive insulin than for those receiving paper-based intensive insulin (181 vs 156 mg/dL; P=.003, mean of the per-patient mean). Patients treated with software-guided intensive insulin had lower mean BG levels (117 vs 135 mg/dL; P=.0008), sustained greater time in the desired BG target range (95-135 mg/dL; 68% vs 52%; P=.0001), had less frequent hypoglycemia (percentage of time BG level was <70 mg/dL: 0.51% vs 1.44%; P=.04), and showed decreased glycemic variability (BG level per-patient standard deviation from the mean: ±29 vs ±42 mg/dL; P=.01).

Conclusion: Surgical ICU patients whose intensive insulin infusions were managed using the software-guided program achieved tighter glycemic control and fewer glycemic derangements than those managed with the paper-based insulin dosing regimen.

Keywords: APACHE II; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; BG; CV; GPI; GV; ICU; MAGE; blood glucose; coefficient of variation; glycemic penalty index; glycemic variability; intensive care unit; mean amplitude of glycemic excursions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types