Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation
- PMID: 24001589
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.048
Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were collected to investigate the effect of the number of mechanical pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following mechanical stimulation (MS). We used a 306-ch whole-head MEG system. SEFs were elicited through tactile stimuli with 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 8-pins using healthy participants. Tactile stimuli were applied to the tip of the right index finger. SEF following electrical stimulation of the index finger was recorded in order to compare the activity in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) following MS. Prominent SEFs were recorded from the contralateral hemisphere approximately 54 ms (P50m) and 125 ms (P100m) after MS regardless of the number of pins. Equivalent current dipoles were located in the S1. The source activities for P50m and P100m significantly increased in tandem with the number of pins for MS. However, the increased ratios for the source activities according to the increase in the number of pins were significantly smaller than that induced by electrical stimulation, and when the number of the pins doubled from 1-pin to 2-pins, from 2-pins to 4-pins, and from 4-pins to 8-pins, S1 activities increased by only 130%. Additionally, source activities significantly increased when the inter-pin distance increased from 2.4 to 7.2 mm. The number of stimulated receptors was considered to have increased with an increase in the inter-pin distance as well as an increase in the number of pins. These findings clarified the effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance for MS on SEFs.
Keywords: ECD; ES; MEG; MRI; MS; Magnetoencephalography; Mechanical stimulation; S1; SEF; SSS; ST; Tactile stimulation; electrical stimulation; equivalent current dipole; magnetic resonance image; magnetoencephalography; mechanical stimulation; primary somatosensory cortex; sensory perception threshold; signal space separation; somatosensory evoked magnetic field.
© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Somatosensory cortical plasticity after toe-to-index transfer.Neuroreport. 2012 Dec 5;23(17):1000-5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835a649e. Neuroreport. 2012. PMID: 23044495
-
Oral structure representation in human somatosensory cortex.Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 15;43(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.040. Epub 2008 Jul 11. Neuroimage. 2008. PMID: 18672075
-
The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and cortical oscillations.Eur J Neurosci. 2021 May;53(10):3433-3446. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15209. Epub 2021 Apr 10. Eur J Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33772899
-
The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.Prog Neurobiol. 2000 Aug;61(5):495-523. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(99)00063-5. Prog Neurobiol. 2000. PMID: 10748321 Review.
-
Tracking functions of cortical networks on a millisecond timescale.Neural Netw. 2000 Oct-Nov;13(8-9):883-9. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00061-7. Neural Netw. 2000. PMID: 11156199 Review.
Cited by
-
Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation.Neural Plast. 2018 Apr 3;2018:5383514. doi: 10.1155/2018/5383514. eCollection 2018. Neural Plast. 2018. PMID: 29849557 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns.Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 13;9(1):16677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31723202 Free PMC article.
-
No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1023. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01023. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25566038 Free PMC article.
-
The Number or Type of Stimuli Used for Somatosensory Stimulation Affected the Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability.Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):1494. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111494. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34827493 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of sensory attenuation in the somatosensory domain using EEG in a novel virtual reality paradigm.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87244-9. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39843944 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources