Order of donor type in pediatric kidney transplant recipients requiring retransplantation
- PMID: 24002689
- PMCID: PMC3763240
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829acb10
Order of donor type in pediatric kidney transplant recipients requiring retransplantation
Abstract
Background: Living-donor kidney transplantation (KT) is encouraged for children with end-stage renal disease due to superior long-term graft survival compared with deceased-donor KT. Despite this, there has been a steady decrease in the use of living-donor KT for pediatric recipients. Due to their young age at transplantation, most pediatric recipients eventually require retransplantation, and the optimal order of donor type is not clear.
Methods: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed first and second graft survival among 14,799 pediatric (<18 years old) recipients undergoing KT between 1987 and 2010.
Results: Living-donor grafts had longer survival compared with deceased-donor grafts, similarly among both first (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.84; P<0.001) and second (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P<0.001) transplants. Living-donor second grafts had longer survival compared with deceased-donor second grafts, similarly after living-donor (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83; P<0.001) and deceased-donor (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P=0.02) first transplants. Cumulative graft life of two transplants was similar regardless of the order of deceased-donor and living-donor transplantation.
Conclusions: Deceased-donor KT in pediatric recipients followed by living-donor retransplantation does not negatively impact the living-donor graft survival advantage and provides similar cumulative graft life compared with living-donor KT followed by deceased-donor retransplantation. Clinical decision-making for pediatric patients with healthy, willing living donors should consider these findings in addition to the risk of sensitization, aging of the living donor, and deceased-donor waiting times.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Gillen DL, Stehman-Breen CO, Smith JM, et al. Survival advantage of pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant among children awaiting kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008;8 (12):2600. - PubMed
-
- McDonald SP, Craig JC. Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (26):2654. - PubMed
-
- Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Data reports. 2012
-
- Bartosh SM, Leverson G, Robillard D, Sollinger HW. Long-term outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients who survive into adulthood. Transplantation. 2003;76 (8):1195. - PubMed
-
- Dale-Shall AW, Smith JM, McBride MA, Hingorani SR, McDonald RA. The relationship of donor source and age on short- and long-term allograft survival in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2009;13 (6):711. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
