Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT
- PMID: 24004118
- PMCID: PMC3951177
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214726
Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT
Abstract
Background: Major issues in the implementation of screening for lung cancer by means of low-dose computed tomography (CT) are the definition of a positive result and the management of lung nodules detected on the scans. We conducted a population-based prospective study to determine factors predicting the probability that lung nodules detected on the first screening low-dose CT scans are malignant or will be found to be malignant on follow-up.
Methods: We analyzed data from two cohorts of participants undergoing low-dose CT screening. The development data set included participants in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (PanCan). The validation data set included participants involved in chemoprevention trials at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), sponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute. The final outcomes of all nodules of any size that were detected on baseline low-dose CT scans were tracked. Parsimonious and fuller multivariable logistic-regression models were prepared to estimate the probability of lung cancer.
Results: In the PanCan data set, 1871 persons had 7008 nodules, of which 102 were malignant, and in the BCCA data set, 1090 persons had 5021 nodules, of which 42 were malignant. Among persons with nodules, the rates of cancer in the two data sets were 5.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Predictors of cancer in the model included older age, female sex, family history of lung cancer, emphysema, larger nodule size, location of the nodule in the upper lobe, part-solid nodule type, lower nodule count, and spiculation. Our final parsimonious and full models showed excellent discrimination and calibration, with areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of more than 0.90, even for nodules that were 10 mm or smaller in the validation set.
Conclusions: Predictive tools based on patient and nodule characteristics can be used to accurately estimate the probability that lung nodules detected on baseline screening low-dose CT scans are malignant. (Funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00751660.).
Figures


Comment in
-
Cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):2060-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312411. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24256386 No abstract available.
-
Cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT.N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):2060. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312411. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24256387 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Prediction Models for Identifying Malignancy in Pulmonary Nodules Detected via Low-Dose Computed Tomography.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1921221. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21221. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32058555
-
Predicting Malignancy Risk of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules-Mean Diameter or Volume.J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 25. J Thorac Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30368011
-
Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines.Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4019-4029. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4767-2. Epub 2017 Mar 14. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28293773 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review.JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):264-273. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24287. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35040882 Review.
-
[Advances and Clinical Application of Malignant Probability Prediction Models for Solitary Pulmonary Nodule].Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 20;24(9):660-667. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.29. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34455736 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Identification of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and benign lesions in isolated solid lung nodules based on a nomogram of intranodal and perinodal CT radiomic features.Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 6;12:924055. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.924055. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36147924 Free PMC article.
-
ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening.Eur Respir J. 2015 Jul;46(1):28-39. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00033015. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Eur Respir J. 2015. PMID: 25929956 Free PMC article.
-
Region specific lung nodule management practice guideline.J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2319-2323. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.31. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27746965 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Oral Bacterial Lysate OM-85: Advances in Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Oct 1;18:4387-4399. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S484897. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 39372675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung cancer risk and cancer-specific mortality in subjects undergoing routine imaging test when stratified with and without identified lung nodule on imaging study.Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3518-27. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3775-3. Epub 2015 May 9. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25953000
References
-
- Croswell JM, Baker SG, Marcus PM, Clapp JD, Kramer BS. Cumulative incidence of false-positive results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:505–12. - PubMed
-
- American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1107–36. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical