Use of static or articulating spacers for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
- PMID: 24005200
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01461
Use of static or articulating spacers for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Background: The so-called gold standard for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty is two-stage reimplantation. However, it is unclear whether use of static or articulating antibiotic-impregnated spacers during the interim period between these two stages is superior. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of static and articulating spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty.
Methods: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature indexed by MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify studies reporting the outcomes of antibiotic spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty. Seven Level-III comparative studies and thirty-two Level-IV case series remained following the screening process. The data in these studies were extracted and aggregated to compare the reinfection rate, range of knee motion, functional scores, and complication rates between static and articulating spacers.
Results: The two types of spacers demonstrated similar reinfection rates (7% for articulating and 12% for static, p = 0.2). However, the articulating spacers resulted in significantly greater range of knee motion after reimplantation (101° for articulating and 91° for static, p = 0.0002). Despite this difference in ultimate knee motion, functional scores in the treatment groups were similar. Rates of wound-related and spacer-related complications were similarly low with both types of spacers.
Conclusions: Our review failed to identify a significant difference in the ability of static or articulating spacers to eradicate periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty. Compared with static spacers, articulating spacers provided improved knee motion following reimplantation, although functional scores were similar in the two treatment groups. We encourage arthroplasty surgeons to consider both static and articulating spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty and to tailor treatment on the basis of patient-related factors.
Similar articles
-
Static Versus Articulating Spacer: Does Infectious Pathogen Type Affect Treatment Success?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1850-1855. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003075. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38662933
-
Impact of Spacer Constraint on Outcomes in Two-Stage Exchange Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S520-S527. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.009. Epub 2025 May 9. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40349865
-
Systematic review comparing static and articulating spacers used for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):553-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Sep 5. J Arthroplasty. 2014. PMID: 24011676
-
Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Dec;20(12):2445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1885-x. Epub 2012 Jan 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. PMID: 22270671
-
The autoclaving and re-implantation of an infected prosthesis as a spacer during resection knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):111-125. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00722-x. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022. PMID: 34322843 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty using a spiked tibial cement spacer in infected total knee arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2617-2623. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06257-7. Epub 2024 Jul 27. Int Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39066904 Free PMC article.
-
Complications associated with 133 static, antibiotic-laden spacers after TKA.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3096-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3646-0. Epub 2015 May 15. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 25975754
-
First Stage Revision of Infected TKR: A Technique of Handcrafted Articulating Spacers and Cement Pancake Soft Tissue Spacers.Indian J Orthop. 2022 Oct 6;56(12):2086-2092. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00739-9. eCollection 2022 Dec. Indian J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36507218 Free PMC article.
-
Prosthetic joint infection.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr;27(2):302-45. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014. PMID: 24696437 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A retrospective comparative study of infection control rate and clinical outcome between open debridement using antibiotic-impregnated cement beads and a two-stage revision in acute periprosthetic knee joint infection.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18891. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018891. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 31977899 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical