Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May;90(3):188-94.
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051029. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour

Cliodna A M McNulty et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a structured complex intervention increases opportunistic chlamydia screening testing of patients aged 15-24 years attending English general practitioner (GP) practices.

Methods: A prospective, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with a modified Zelen design involving 160 practices in South West England in 2010. The intervention was based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). It comprised of practice-based education with up to two additional contacts to increase the importance of screening to GP staff and their confidence to offer tests through skill development (including videos). Practical resources (targets, posters, invitation cards, computer reminders, newsletters including feedback) aimed to actively influence social cognitions of staff, increasing their testing intention.

Results: Data from 76 intervention and 81 control practices were analysed. In intervention practices, chlamydia screening test rates were 2.43/100 15-24-year-olds registered preintervention, 4.34 during intervention and 3.46 postintervention; controls testing rates were 2.61/100 registered patients prior intervention, 3.0 during intervention and 2.82 postintervention. During the intervention period, testing in intervention practices was 1.76 times as great (CI 1.24 to 2.48) as controls; this persisted for 9 months postintervention (1.57 times as great, CI 1.27 to 2.30). Chlamydia infections detected increased in intervention practices from 2.1/1000 registered 15-24-year-olds prior intervention to 2.5 during the intervention compared with 2.0 and 2.3/1000 in controls (Estimated Rate Ratio intervention versus controls 1.4 (CI 1.01 to 1.93).

Conclusions: This complex intervention doubled chlamydia screening tests in fully engaged practices. The modified Zelen design gave realistic measures of practice full engagement (63%) and efficacy of this educational intervention in general practice; it should be used more often.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio database. UKCRN number 9722.

Keywords: BEHAVIOURAL INTERVENTIONS; CHLAMYDIA INFECTION; EDUCATION; GENERAL PRACTICE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
The Theory of Planned Behaviour and clinician's intention to undertake chlamydia screening tests.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Control: Chlamydia control in Europe. 2009. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0906_GUI_Chlamydia_Co....
    1. Salisbury C, MacLeod J, Egger M. Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:99–103 - PMC - PubMed
    1. ONS Opinions Survey report no 41 Contraception and Sexual Health 2008/9.
    1. Hogan AH, Howell-Jones RS, Pottinger EM, et al. “They should be offering it”: a qualitative study to investigate young peoples’ attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP practices. BMC Public Health 2010;10:616. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Chlamydia Screening Programme. The bigger picture. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme 2008/09 Annual Report, 2009. http://www.chlamydiascreening.nhs.uk/ps/resources/annual-reports/NCSPa-r... (accessed 10 May 2013)

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources