Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Apr;53(3):761-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0580-0. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

Dietary conjugated α-linolenic acid did not improve glucose tolerance in a neonatal pig model

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dietary conjugated α-linolenic acid did not improve glucose tolerance in a neonatal pig model

Christian-Alexandre Castellano et al. Eur J Nutr. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: There is an increased interest in the benefits of conjugated α-linolenic acid (CLNA) on obesity-related complications such as insulin resistance and diabetes. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a 1% dietary supplementation of mono-CLNA isomers (c9-t11-c15-18:3 + c9-t13-c15-18:3) improved glucose and lipid metabolism in neonatal pigs.

Methods: Since mono-CLNA isomers combine one conjugated two-double-bond system with an n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) structure, the experimental protocol was designed to isolate the dietary structural characteristics of the molecules by comparing a CLNA diet with three other dietary fats: (1) conjugated linoleic acid (c9-t11-18:2 + t10-c12-18:2; CLA), (2) non-conjugated n-3 PUFA, and (3) n-6 PUFA. Thirty-two piglets weaned at 3 weeks of age were distributed among the four dietary groups. Diets were isoenergetic and food intake was controlled by a gastric tube. After 2 weeks of supplementation, gastro-enteral (OGTT) and parenteral (IVGTT) glucose tolerance tests were conducted.

Results: Dietary supplementation with mono-CLNA did not modify body weight/fat or blood lipid profiles (p > 0.82 and p > 0.57, respectively) compared with other dietary groups. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide responses to OGTT and IVGTT in the CLNA group were not different from the three other dietary groups (p > 0.18 and p > 0.15, respectively). Compared to the non-conjugated n-3 PUFA diet, CLNA-fed animals had decreased liver composition in three n-3 fatty acids (18:3n-3; 20:3n-3; 22:5n-3; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results suggest that providing 1% mono-CLNA is not effective in improving insulin sensitivity in neonatal pigs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Nutr. 2012 Jun;51(4):483-95 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Mar 27;244(3):678-82 - PubMed
    1. J Oleo Sci. 2012;61(8):433-41 - PubMed
    1. Br J Nutr. 2010 Jan;103(2):189-96 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Feb;290(2):E347-54 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources