Does glycopyrrolate at anesthesia induction increase temporary postoperative urinary retention after a midurethral sling?
- PMID: 24008194
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.05.007
Does glycopyrrolate at anesthesia induction increase temporary postoperative urinary retention after a midurethral sling?
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Does glycopyrrolate at anesthesia induction increase temporary postoperative urinary retention after a midurethral sling?" J Clin Anesth. 2013 Nov; 25(7): 572-7.J Clin Anesth. 2021 Jun;70:110137. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110137. Epub 2020 Dec 9. J Clin Anesth. 2021. PMID: 33308967 No abstract available.
Abstract
Study objective: To determine whether patients receiving perioperative glycopyrrolate during midurethral sling surgery had more acute but temporary postoperative urinary retention.
Design: Retrospective cohort from 2006 to 2011.
Setting: Northern Virginia community urology practice.
Measurements: To minimize variability in surgical technique and postoperative care, all cases were from a single fellowship-trained urologist who performed most of the female incontinence procedures. Inclusion criteria were charts of women, 18 years of age or older, who had a primary preoperative diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and who underwent a midurethral sling procedure. Of 151 patients charts, 135 met study eligibility: 57 (42.2%) patients received glycopyrrolate; 78 (57.8%) did not. The postoperative course of those who did and did not receive glycopyrrolate was compared and formed the basis of group allocation. Data collected included age, body mass index, incontinence type, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, surgery performed, anesthesia type, estimated blood loss, intraoperative fluids, surgery end time to void, and postoperative urinary retention.
Main results: No differences existed between the groups in baseline or surgical data. Seven patients (5.2%) had acute temporary postoperative retention, two of whom received glycopyrrolate and 5 did not (3.51% vs 6.41%; relative risk [RR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 -2.72, P = 0.70). Excluding those with continued persistent voiding dysfunction beyond 48 hours from surgery, only 3 patients (2.22%) had acute temporary postoperative urinary retention: one received glycopyrrolate and two did not (1.75% vs 2.56%; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.064 - 7.36; P = 0.99).
Conclusion: Acute temporary postoperative urinary retention is rare after midurethral slings. Glycopyrrolate during anesthesia induction does not appear significantly to increase this rate.
Keywords: Anesthetics: antimuscarinic; Glycopyrrolate; Midurethral slings; Urinary retention.
© 2013.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Urinary Dysfunction After Midurethral Sling Placement: A Comparison of Two Voiding Trial Methods.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Jun;31(6):533-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38582258
-
Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):656.e1-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27319367
-
The role of perioperative medications in urinary retention following midurethral sling.Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2455-2462. doi: 10.1002/nau.24516. Epub 2020 Sep 17. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020. PMID: 32940931
-
[Predictive factors of immediate post-operative acute urinary retention or voiding dysfunction following mid-urethral sling surgery: A literature review].Prog Urol. 2020 Dec;30(17):1118-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 31. Prog Urol. 2020. PMID: 32493661 French.
-
Active Compared With Passive Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May 1;143(5):633-643. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005567. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38547487
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous