Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;32(9):e370-6.
doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31828e8c09.

Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only regimens in HIV-infected children and adolescents

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only regimens in HIV-infected children and adolescents

Michael Neely et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: In adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only antiretroviral regimens (NOARs) with ≥3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are less potent than highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Published pediatric experience with NOARs is limited; thus, we wished to better define the virological, immunological and toxicological effects of NOARs in children and adolescents.

Methods: We analyzed data from NOAR-treated participants in LEGACY, a multicenter observational cohort study of HIV-infected children and adolescents. NOAR-treated case-participants were matched to participants without prior NOAR who initiated HAART during the same year for comparison.

Results: Of 575 participants with data from time of HIV diagnosis through 2006, 67 (12%) received NOARs for at least 24 weeks; most (46%) received the fixed dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir. NOAR use peaked in 2001 to 2002. NOAR-treated participants were significantly older and more treatment experienced than HAART-treated participants. Virologic outcomes, including the percentage of participants with a plasma HIV RNA viral load <400 copies/mL at week 24 (47% versus 34%) and the mean 24-week change in log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load from baseline (-0.63 versus -1.02), were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but virologic rebound was more likely in NOAR-treated participants (77% versus 54%, P = 0.02). Increase in CD4 percentage points from baseline to 24 weeks was negligible in NOAR-treated participants compared with HAART-treated participants (0.95% versus 10.1%, P < 0.001). Anemia and leukopenia were more commonly reported with NOARs than HAART.

Discussion: Week 24 virologic outcomes were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but NOAR durability was poorer and their use was associated with less immunologic reconstitution. NOARs should play a limited role in pediatric and adolescent antiretroviral therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change in (A) log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load and (B) CD4+ lymphocyte percentage point from baseline to 48 weeks in the total study cohort after starting a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor only antiretroviral regimen (NOAR) or highly active antiretroviral therapy(HAART). Error bars indicate standard deviations. The numbers of subjects with available observations at each time (N) are indicated at the bottom of both plots, with the NOAR group on top. LEGACY cohort, 2001-2006. (A) Note: P-values for weeks 24 and 48 are ≥ 0.05.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change in (A) log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load and (B) CD4+ lymphocyte percentage point from baseline to 48 weeks in the total study cohort after starting a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor only antiretroviral regimen (NOAR) or highly active antiretroviral therapy(HAART). Error bars indicate standard deviations. The numbers of subjects with available observations at each time (N) are indicated at the bottom of both plots, with the NOAR group on top. LEGACY cohort, 2001-2006. (A) Note: P-values for weeks 24 and 48 are ≥ 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor only antiretroviral regimen (NOAR)-treated and highly active antiretroviral therapy(HAART)-treated participants with adverse events reported at any time during the treatment period. LEGACY cohort, 2001-2006. Note: Only P-values < 0.05 are shown. P-values noted above represent comparisons between the NOAR and HAART columns for leukopenia(*) and anemia(†). P-values for other adverse events are ≥ 0.05.

References

    1. Kumar PN, Rodriguez-French A, Thompson MA, et al. A prospective, 96-week study of the impact of Trizivir, Combivir/nelfinavir, and lamivudine/stavudine/nelfinavir on lipids, metabolic parameters and efficacy in antiretroviral-naive patients: effect of sex and ethnicity. HIV Med. 2006;7:85–98. - PubMed
    1. Staszewski S, Keiser P, Montaner J, et al. Abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine vs indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: A randomized equivalence trial. JAMA. 2001;285:1155–1163. - PubMed
    1. Vibhagool A, Cahn P, Schechter M, et al. Triple nucleoside treatment with abacavir plus the lamivudine/zidovudine combination tablet (COM) compared to indinavir/COM in antiretroviral therapy-naïve adults: results of a 48-week open-label, equivalence trial (CNA3014) Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:1103–1114. - PubMed
    1. Gulick RM, Ribaudo HJ, Shikuma CM, et al. Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. New Engl J Med. 2004;350:1850–1861. - PubMed
    1. Clumeck N, Goebel F, Rozenbaum W, et al. Simplification with abacavir-based triple nucleoside therapy versus continued protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA. AIDS. 2001;15:1517–1526. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms