Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Dec 1;178(11):1638-47.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt164. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

Comparison of address-based sampling and random-digit dialing methods for recruiting young men as controls in a case-control study of testicular cancer susceptibility

Comparative Study

Comparison of address-based sampling and random-digit dialing methods for recruiting young men as controls in a case-control study of testicular cancer susceptibility

Bartholt Clagett et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Random-digit dialing (RDD) using landline telephone numbers is the historical gold standard for control recruitment in population-based epidemiologic research. However, increasing cell-phone usage and diminishing response rates suggest that the effectiveness of RDD in recruiting a random sample of the general population, particularly for younger target populations, is decreasing. In this study, we compared landline RDD with alternative methods of control recruitment, including RDD using cell-phone numbers and address-based sampling (ABS), to recruit primarily white men aged 18-55 years into a study of testicular cancer susceptibility conducted in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, metropolitan area between 2009 and 2012. With few exceptions, eligible and enrolled controls recruited by means of RDD and ABS were similar with regard to characteristics for which data were collected on the screening survey. While we find ABS to be a comparably effective method of recruiting young males compared with landline RDD, we acknowledge the potential impact that selection bias may have had on our results because of poor overall response rates, which ranged from 11.4% for landline RDD to 1.7% for ABS.

Keywords: case-control studies; data collection; epidemiologic methods; postal service; telephone; testicular neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Olson SH, Kelsey JL, Pearson TA, et al. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(2):210–222. - PubMed
    1. Bunin GR, Spector LG, Olshan AF, et al. Secular trends in response rates for controls selected by random digit dialing in childhood cancer studies: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(1):109–116. - PubMed
    1. Voigt LF, Schwartz SM, Doody DR, et al. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(1):118–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2012. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201212.PDF. ). (Accessed April 12, 2013)
    1. Iannacchione VG. The changing role of address-based sampling in survey research. Public Opin Q. 2011;75(3):556–575.

Publication types