Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 5;2013(9):CD006214.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub4.

Debridement for surgical wounds

Fiona Smith  1 , Nancy Dryburgh, Jayne Donaldson, Melloney Mitchell
Affiliations

Debridement for surgical wounds

Fiona Smith et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Debridement for surgical wounds.
    Smith F, Donaldson J, Brown T. Smith F, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 7;5(5):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38712723 Free PMC article. Review.

Abstract

Background: Surgical wounds that become infected are often debrided because clinicians believe that removal of this necrotic or infected tissue will expedite wound healing. There are numerous methods available but no consensus on which one is most effective for surgical wounds.

Objectives: To determine the effect of different methods of debridement on the rate of debridement and healing of surgical wounds.

Search methods: In March 2013, for this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with outcomes including at least one of the following: time to complete debridement or time to complete healing.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently reviewed the abstracts and titles obtained from the search, extracted data independently using a standardised extraction sheet and independently assessed methodological quality. One review author was involved in all stages of the data collection and extraction process, thus ensuring continuity.

Main results: Five RCTs (159 participants) were eligible for inclusion; all compared treatments for infected surgical wounds and reported time required to achieve a clean wound bed (complete debridement). One trial compared an enzymatic agent (streptokinase/streptodornase) with saline-soaked dressings. Four trials compared the effectiveness of dextranomer beads or paste with other products (different comparator in each trial) to achieve complete debridement. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the unique comparisons within each trial. One trial reported that dextranomer achieved a clean wound bed significantly more quickly than Eusol, and one trial comparing enzymatic debridement with saline-soaked dressings reported that the enzyme-treated wounds were cleaned more quickly. However, methodological quality was poor in these two trials.

Authors' conclusions: There is a lack of large, high-quality published RCTs evaluating debridement per se, or comparing different methods of debridement for surgical wounds, to guide clinical decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Goode 1979 {published data only}
    1. Goode AW, Glazer G, Ellis BW. The cost effectiveness of dextranomer and Eusol in the treatment of infected surgical wounds. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1979;33(11‐12):325‐6. - PubMed
Michiels 1990 {published data only}
    1. Michiels I, Christiaens M‐R. Dextranomer (Debrisan) paste in post‐operative wounds: a controlled study. Clinical Trials Journal 1990;27(4):283‐90. - PubMed
Poulson 1983 {published data only}
    1. Poulson J, Kristensen VN, Brygger HE, Delikaris P. Treatment of infected surgical wounds with Varidase. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1983;149(3):245‐8. - PubMed
Sondergaard 1982 {published data only}
    1. Sondergaard JO, Galatius H. Debrisan compared with chloramine packs in the treatment of postoperative infected wounds [Debrisan versus kloramin‐mecheved postoperative inficerede cikatricer]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1982;144(21):1523‐5. - PubMed
Young 1982 {published data only}
    1. Young HL, Wheeler MH. Report of the prospective trial of dextranomer beads (Debrisan) and silicone foam elastomer (silastic dressings in surgical wounds). British Journal of Surgery 1982;69(1):33‐4. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Allie 2004 {published data only}
    1. Allie DE, Herbert CJ, Lirtzman MD, Wyatt CH, Keller VA, Souther SM, et al. Novel treatment strategy for leg and sternal wound complications after coronary graft surgery: bioengineered Apligraf. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2004;78(2):673‐8. - PubMed
Bethell 2003 {published data only}
    1. Bethell E. Why gauze dressings should not be the first choice to manage acute surgical cavity wounds. Journal of Wound Care 2003;12(6):237‐9. - PubMed
Cannavo 1998 {published data only}
    1. Cannavo M, Fairbrother G, Owen D, Ingle J, Lumley T. A comparison of dressings in the management of surgical abdominal wounds. Journal of Wound Care 1998;7(2):57‐62. - PubMed
Capasso 2003 {published data only}
    1. Capasso VA, Munro BH. The cost and efficacy of two wound treatments. AORN Journal 2003;77(5):984‐1004. - PubMed
Cohn 2004 {published data only}
    1. Cohn SM, Lopez PP, Brown M, Namias N, Jackowskl J, Li P, et al. Open surgical wounds: how does Aquacel compare with wet‐to‐dry gauze. Journal of Wound Care 2004;13(1):10‐2. - PubMed
De Feo 2001 {published data only}
    1. Feo M, Sante LS, Ramano G, Renzulli A, Corter AD, Utili R, et al. Treatment of recurrent staphylococcal mediastinitis: still a controversial issue. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2001;75(2):538‐42. - PubMed
De Feo 2003 {published data only}
    1. Feo M, Gregorio R, Corter AD, Marra C, Amarelli C, Renzulli A, et al. Deep sternal wound infection: the role of early debridement surgery. European Journal of Cardio‐thoracic Surgery 2003;19(6):811‐6. - PubMed
Doughty 2005 {published data only}
    1. Doughty DB. Preventing and managing surgical wound dehiscence. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2005;18(6):319‐22. - PubMed
Douville 2004 {published data only}
    1. Douville EC, Asaph JW, Dworkin RJ, Handy JR, Canepa CS, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Sternal preservation: a better way to treat most sternal wound complications after cardiac surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2004;78(5):1659‐64. - PubMed
Edwards 1967 {published data only}
    1. Edwards RH, Killen DA. Comparison of two methods of management of clean surgical wounds. JAMA 1967;201(1):137‐8. - PubMed
Foster 2000 {published data only}
    1. Foster L, Moore P, Clark S. Comparison of hydrofibre and alginate dressings on open acute surgical wounds. Journal of Wound Care 2000;9(9):442‐5. - PubMed
Gliantsev 1996 {published data only}
    1. Gliantsev SO, Savvina TV. Comparative evaluation of activity of proteolytic enzymes used in surgery. Biulleten Eksperimentalnoi Biologii 1996;121(6):16‐20. - PubMed
Gottrup 2005 {published data only}
    1. Gottrup F. The significance of dressings and topical agents in secondary healing [Betydningen af bandage og lokale midler ved sekundaert helede kirurgiske sar]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 2005;167(47):4473‐6. - PubMed
Granick 2006 {published data only}
    1. Granick MS, Posnett J, Jacoby M, Noruthun S, Ganchi PA, Datiashvili RO. Efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of a high‐powered parallel waterjet for wound debridement. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2006;14(4):394‐7. - PubMed
Guest 2005 {published data only}
    1. Guest JF, Ruiz FJ. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wound healing by secondary intention in the US and UK. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2005;21(2):94‐101. - PubMed
Kuleshov 1992 {published data only}
    1. Kuleshov SE, Kaem RI. The use of carbon dioxide laser in acute surgical infection of the soft tissues. Khirurgiia Moskva 1992;2:94‐101. - PubMed
Moore 2000 {published data only}
    1. Moore PJ, Foster L. Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds. British Journal of Nursing 2000;9(17):1128‐32. - PubMed
Moore 2001 {published data only}
    1. Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2001;1(2):2. - PMC - PubMed
Moues 2004 {published data only}
    1. Moues CM, Vos MC, Bemd GJCM, Stijnen T, Hovius SER. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum‐assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomised trial. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2004;12(1):11‐7. - PubMed
Mulder 1995 {published data only}
    1. Mulder GD. Evaluation of three nonwoven sponges in the debridement of chronic wounds. Ostomy/Wound Management 1995;41(3):62‐7. - PubMed
Rand 1998 {published data only}
    1. Rand RP, Cochran RP, Aziz S, Hofer BO, Allen MD, Verrier ED, et al. Prospective trial of catheter irrigation and muscle flaps for sternal wound infection. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1998;65(4):1046‐9. - PubMed
Soul 1978 {published data only}
    1. Soul JA. A trial of Debrisan in the cleansing of infected surgical wounds. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1978;32(6):172‐3. - PubMed
Tolstykh 1987 {published data only}
    1. Tolstykh PI, Glostishchev VK, Khanin AG, Aboyants RK, Yusuf MY, Antsyshkin VA. The effect of biologically active dressings of wounds upon the development of the wound process. Vestnivk Khirurgh IM I I Grekova 1987;138(3):57‐60. - PubMed
Williams 1995 {published data only}
    1. Williams P, Howells REJ, Miller E, Foster ME. A comparison of two alginate dressings used in surgical wounds. Journal of Wound Care 1995;4(4):170‐2. - PubMed
Zeitani 2004 {published data only}
    1. Zeitani J, Bertoldo F, Bassano C, Penta de Peppo A, Pellegrino AP, Fakhri FM, et al. Superficial wound dehiscence after median sternotomy: surgical treatment versus secondary wound healing. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2004;77(2):672‐5. - PubMed

Additional references

Ashworth 2002
    1. Ashworth J. Conservative sharp debridement: the professional and legal issues. Professional Nurse 2002;17(10):585‐8. - PubMed
Ayello 2004
    1. Ayello EA, Cuddigan JE. Debridement: controlling the necrotic/cellular burden. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2004;17(2):66‐78. - PubMed
Baharestani 1999
    1. Baharestani M. The clinical relevance of debridement. In: Baharestani M, Gottrup F, Holstein P, Vanscheidt W editor(s). The clinical relevance of debridement. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1999:1‐15.
Bale 1997
    1. Bale S, Jones V. Wound care nursing: a patient centred approach. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1997.
Baxter 2003
    1. Baxter H. Management of surgical wounds. Nursing Times 2003;99(13):66‐8. - PubMed
Bradley 1999
    1. Bradley M, Cullum N, Sheldon T. The debridement of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 1999;3(17 Pt 1):iii‐iv, 1‐78. - PubMed
Brennan 1985
    1. Brennan SS, Leaper DJ. The effect of antiseptics on the healing wound: a study using the rabbit ear chamber. British Journal of Surgery 1985;72(October):780‐2. - PubMed
Dealey 1994
    1. Dealey C. The care of wounds. The care of wounds. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
Edwards 2010
    1. Edwards J. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003556.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Falabella 2006
    1. Falabella, AF. Debridement and wound bed preparation. Dermatologic Therapy 2006;19(6):317‐25. - PubMed
Flanagan 1999
    1. Flanagan M. Reviewing the case for debridement. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(6):267. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hofman 2002
    1. Hofman D. Debridement—a nursing issue?. www.etrs.org/bulletin9_3/section5.html 2002 (accessed 17 November 2005).
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Lewis 2000
    1. Lewis R, Whiting P, ter Reit G, O'Meara S, Glanville J. A rapid systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2000. - PubMed
Morgan 1991
    1. Morgan DA. Chlorinated solutions ‐ an update. Journal of Tissue Viability 1991;2:31‐3.
Morgan 2004
    1. Morgan DA. Formulary of wound management products: a guide for health care staff. 9th Edition. Haslemere, Surrey, UK: Euromed Communications Ltd, 2004:32‐3.
NICE 2001
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics for difficult to heal surgical wounds. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=article&o=32175 (accessed 8 July 2005).
O'Brien 2002
    1. O'Brien M. Exploring methods of wound debridement. British Journal of Community Nursing 2002;7(12):10,12,14,16‐8. - PubMed
O'Brien 2003a
    1. O'Brien M. Exploring methods of wound debridement. In: White RJ editor(s). Trends in wound care. Vol. II. Dinton, Salisbury: Quay Books Division, MA Healthcare, 2003:95‐107.
O'Brien 2003b
    1. O'Brien M. Debridement: ethical, legal and practical considerations. British Journal of Community Nursing 2003;8(Suppl 3):23‐5. - PubMed
O'Brien 2003c
    1. O'Brien M. Methods of debridement and patient focused care. Journal of Community Nursing 2003;17(11):17‐25.
Pollard 2008
    1. Pollard T. Now is the time to find a new benchmark. Journal of Wound Care 2008;17(3):93. - PubMed
Poston 1996
    1. Poston J. Surgical nurse: sharp debridement of devitalised tissue: the nurse's role. British Journal of Nursing 1996;5(11):655‐6, 658‐62. - PubMed
Ramundo 2000
    1. Ramundo J, Wells J. Wound debridement. In: Bryant RA editor(s). Acute and chronic wounds: nursing management. 2nd Edition. St Louis: Mosby, 2000:157‐78.
Schultz 2003
    1. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2003;11(Suppl 1):S1‐28. - PubMed
Sibbald 2000
    1. Sibbald RG, Williamson D, Orsted HL, Campbell K, Keast D, Krasner D, et al. Preparing the wound bed ‐ debridement, bacterial balance and moisture balance. Ostomy/Wound Management 2000;46(11):14‐35. - PubMed
SIGN 2007
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Search filters. www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed 13 June 2013).
Stotts 2000
    1. Stotts NA. Wound infection: diagnosis and management. In: Bryant RA editor(s). Acute and chronic wounds: nursing management. 2nd Edition. St Louis: Mosby, 2000:179‐88.
Stotts 2004
    1. Stotts NA. Wound infection: diagnosis and management. In: Morison MJ, Ovington LG, Wilkie K editor(s). Chronic wound care: a problem based approach. Edinburgh: Mosby, 2004:101‐16.
Thomas 1999
    1. Thomas AML, Moore K. The structure and composition of chronic wound eschar. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(6):285‐90. - PubMed
Ubbink 2006
    1. Ubbink D, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner R, Lubbers M. Randomized clinical trial comparing modern versus gauze dressings to treat open wounds in surgical patients. 16th Conference of the European Wound Management Association; 2006, 18‐20 May; Prague, Czech Republic. 2006.
Vowden 1999a
    1. Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound debridement, part 1: non‐sharp techniques. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(5):237‐40. - PubMed
Vowden 1999b
    1. Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound debridement, part 2: sharp techniques. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(6):291‐6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources