Challenges in the interpretation of dengue vaccine trial results
- PMID: 24009782
- PMCID: PMC3757058
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002126
Challenges in the interpretation of dengue vaccine trial results
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P, et al. (2012) Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 380: 1559–1567. - PubMed
-
- Burke DS, Nisalak A, Johnson DE, Scott RM (1988) A prospective study of dengue infections in Bangkok. Am J Trop Med Hyg 38: 172–180. - PubMed
-
- Guy B, Chanthavanich P, Gimenez S, Sirivichayakul C, Sabchareon A, et al. (2004) Evaluation by flow cytometry of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of dengue infection by sera from Thai children immunized with a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine 22: 3563–3574. - PubMed
-
- Edelman R, Hombach J (2008) Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of dengue vaccines in endemic areas: summary of a World Health Organization technical consultation. Vaccine 26: 4113–4119. - PubMed
-
- Endy T, Chunsuttiwat S, Nisalak A, Libraty D, Green S, et al. (2002) Epidemiology of inapparent and symptomatic acute dengue virus infection: a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am J Epidemiol 156: 40–51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical