Methodological issues of confounding in analytical epidemiologic studies
- PMID: 24009920
- PMCID: PMC3755849
Methodological issues of confounding in analytical epidemiologic studies
Abstract
Confounding can be thought of as mixing the effect of exposure on the risk of disease with a third factor which distorts the measure of association such as risk ratio or odds ratio. This bias arises because of complex functional relationship of confounder with both exposure and disease (outcome). In this article, we provided a conceptual framework review of confounding issues in epidemiologic studies, in particular in observational studies and nonrandomized experimental studies. We have shown in 2 by 2 tables with analytical examples how the index of association will be distorted when confounding is present. The criteria, source of confounding and several points in confounding issues have been addressed. The advantages and disadvantages of several strategies for control of confounding have been discussed.
Keywords: Adjustment; Bias; Confounding; Non-randomized experimental studies; Observational studies; Risk ratio; Statistical models.
References
-
- Hajat C. An introduction to epidemiology. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;713:27–39. - PubMed
-
- Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiology research: principle and quantitative methods. 1st ed. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publication; 1992. pp. 27–32.
-
- Jokel JA, EL moreJG, Katz DL, Epidemiology . Epidemiology, biostatistics and preventive medicine. 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1996. pp. 61–2.
-
- Miettinen O. Confounding and effect modification. Am J Epidemiol. 1974;100:350–3. - PubMed
-
- Rothman JJ. Modern epidemiology. 6 th ed. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1986. pp. 84–94.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources