Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial
- PMID: 24011548
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial
Abstract
Background: In current international guidelines the recommendation for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use has been downgraded in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction on the basis of registry data. In the largest randomised trial (IABP-SHOCK II), IABP support did not reduce 30 day mortality compared with control. However, previous trials in cardiogenic shock showed a mortality benefit only at extended follow-up. The present analysis therefore reports 6 and 12 month results.
Methods: The IABP-SHOCK II trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who were undergoing early revascularisation and optimum medical therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to IABP versus control via a central web-based system. The primary efficacy endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality, but 6 and 12 month follow-up was done in addition to quality-of-life assessment for all survivors with the Euroqol-5D questionnaire. A masked central committee adjudicated clinical outcomes. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00491036.
Findings: Between June 16, 2009, and March 3, 2012, 600 patients were assigned to IABP (n=301) or control (n=299). Of 595 patients completing 12 month follow-up, 155 (52%) of 299 patients in the IABP group and 152 (51%) of 296 patients in the control group had died (relative risk [RR] 1·01, 95% CI 0·86-1·18, p=0·91). There were no significant differences in reinfarction (RR 2·60, 95% CI 0·95-7·10, p=0·05), recurrent revascularisation (0·91, 0·58-1·41, p=0·77), or stroke (1·50, 0·25-8·84, p=1·00). For survivors, quality-of-life measures including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression did not differ significantly between study groups.
Interpretation: In patients undergoing early revascularisation for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, IABP did not reduce 12 month all-cause mortality.
Funding: German Research Foundation; German Heart Research Foundation; German Cardiac Society; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte; University of Leipzig--Heart Centre; Maquet Cardiopulmonary; Teleflex Medical.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Is the intra-aortic balloon pump leaking?Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1616-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61811-5. Epub 2013 Sep 3. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 24011549 No abstract available.
-
Management of acute myocardial infarction.Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):409-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60147-1. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24485580 No abstract available.
-
Management of acute myocardial infarction - Authors' reply.Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):410-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60149-5. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24485581 No abstract available.
-
Management of acute myocardial infarction.Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60148-3. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24485582 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
