Effect of different feeding strategies in intensive dairy farming systems on milk fatty acid profiles, and implications on feeding costs in Italy
- PMID: 24011944
- DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6710
Effect of different feeding strategies in intensive dairy farming systems on milk fatty acid profiles, and implications on feeding costs in Italy
Abstract
The aim of this work was to characterize the fatty acid (FA) profile of milk from intensive dairy farming systems in the Po Plain (Italy) to estimate the costs of the adopted feeding strategies and to simulate the effect of supplementary premiums on the basis of milk FA composition on milk income. Twenty dairy farms with 5 different feeding strategies were studied: 3 corn silage-based systems in which cows were supplemented with a great proportion (CCH), a medium proportion (CCM), or without commercial concentrate mix (CC0), and 2 systems in which part of corn silage was replaced with grass or legume silage (HF) or with fresh herbage (G), cut and fed indoors. Bulk milk was sampled and lactating cow performance, feeding strategies and forage characteristics were recorded through a survey, 3 times during a year. The milk FA supplementary premium was calculated considering C18:3n-3 and saturated FA (SFA) concentrations, and ratio of total cis C18:1 isomers to C16:0. The CCH, CCM, and CC0 systems bought most of their dairy cow feeds off farm, which allowed them to increase milk production to 35,000 L/yr per hectare. Their low dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency led to higher feeding costs per liter of milk (from €0.158 to €0.184), and highest income over feed cost was achieved only for milk yield performance greater than 10,000 kg/cow per year. The use of homegrown forages in HF and G increased dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency and reduced the feeding costs per liter of milk from 9 to 22%, compared with the other studied systems, making HF and G feeding economically competitive, even for a lower milk yield per cow. The studied systems highlighted a remarkable variation in FA profiles. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the highest in CCH (31.53 and 67.84 g/100g of FA) and G (31.23 and 68.45 g/100g of FA), because of the larger proportion of commercial concentrate mix in the cow diet. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the lowest in CCM (27.86 and 63.10 g/100g of FA), because of low roughage-to-concentrate ratio in the cow diet, which is known to favor milk fat depression, affecting particularly these FA. The calculated supplementary premium was the highest in the CCM system, based on milk FA profiles from those herds. The HF diet was rich in forages and resulted in greater concentration of C18:3n-3 in milk (0.57 g/100g of FA) than the other systems and thus led to an increase in milk FA supplementary premium. Milk from G and HF milk had the lowest ratio of Σn-6:Σn-3 FA compared with milk from the systems based on higher corn silage proportion in the cow diet (3.71, and 3.25, respectively, vs. 4.58 to 4.78), with the lower ratios being closer to recommendation for human nutrition.
Keywords: feeding costs; intensive farming system; milk fatty acid; milk fatty acid supplementary premium.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Enteric methane production, rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows fed grass silage- or corn silage-based diets.J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1915-27. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8552. Epub 2015 Jan 9. J Dairy Sci. 2015. PMID: 25582590
-
Effect of corn silage harvest maturity and concentrate type on milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 2012 Mar;95(3):1472-83. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4701. J Dairy Sci. 2012. PMID: 22365229
-
Capacity of milk composition to identify the feeding system used to feed dairy cows.J Dairy Res. 2017 Aug;84(3):254-263. doi: 10.1017/S0022029917000383. J Dairy Res. 2017. PMID: 28831971
-
Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality.J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Jan;95(2):238-52. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6703. Epub 2014 Jun 2. J Sci Food Agric. 2015. PMID: 24752455 Review.
-
A quantitative review of on-farm feeding practices to enhance the quality of grassland-based ruminant dairy and meat products.Animal. 2022 Feb;16 Suppl 1:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100375. Epub 2021 Oct 28. Animal. 2022. PMID: 34688562 Review.
Cited by
-
Plasma fatty acid profile in Italian Holstein-Friesian dairy cows supplemented with natural polyphenols from the olive plant Olea Europaea L.Vet Anim Sci. 2023 May 23;21:100298. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2023.100298. eCollection 2023 Sep. Vet Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 37252208 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Virtual Water and Water Sustainability of Dairy Production in Trentino Alto Adige (North-Eastern Italy).Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;11(4):1047. doi: 10.3390/ani11041047. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33917785 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Grazing Season on Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Fatty Acids of Nutritional Interest of Caciocavallo Palermitano Cheese.Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;12(5):544. doi: 10.3390/ani12050544. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35268112 Free PMC article.
-
SNP co-association and network analyses identify E2F3, KDM5A and BACH2 as key regulators of the bovine milk fatty acid profile.Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):17317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17434-7. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29230020 Free PMC article.
-
Taking the diet of cows into consideration in designing payments to reduce enteric methane emissions on dairy farms.J Dairy Sci. 2023 Oct;106(10):6961-6985. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22766. Epub 2023 May 23. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 37230878 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous