Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;13(5):418-28.
doi: 10.1177/1474515113502748. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Evaluating the role of Cardiac Genetics Nurses in inherited cardiac conditions services using a Maturity Matrix

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluating the role of Cardiac Genetics Nurses in inherited cardiac conditions services using a Maturity Matrix

Maggie Kirk et al. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and genetic risk factors play a role in nearly all such cases. In the UK, health service capacity to meet either current or future estimated needs of people affected by inherited cardiac conditions (ICCs) is inadequate. In 2008 the British Heart Foundation funded nine three-year Cardiac Genetics Nurse (CGN) posts across England and Wales to enhance ICC services. The CGNs were experienced cardiac nurses who had additional training in genetics and acted to coordinate cardiac and genetics service activities.

Aim: To create and apply a framework against which progress in ICC service improvement could be measured over time following the CGN appointments.

Methods: A performance grid (Maturity Matrix, MM) articulating standards in five domains against stages of ICC service development was created by stakeholders through a consensus approach. The MM was used to guide staged self-assessments by the CGNs between 2009 and 2011. A six-point scale was used to locate progress from 'emerging' to 'established', represented graphically by spider diagrams.

Results: Progress in all domains was significant for new, emerging and established services. It was most notable for effective utilisation of care pathways and efficient running of clinics. Commitment to family-centred care was evident.

Conclusion: The ICC-MM provided a comprehensive framework for assessing ICC services and has merit in providing guidance on development. CGNs can help integrate care across specialisms, facilitating the development of effective and sustainable ICC services at new, developing, and more established ICC service locations.

Keywords: Cardiac genetics; ICC services; consensus techniques; inherited cardiac conditions services; maturity matrix; nurses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A Maturity Matrix. (a) Over time the organisation is able to identify performance that meets the expected measure for the appropriate stage of maturity (three stages shown for simplicity). (b) The working document is presented as a grid for self-assessment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Stages of development and use of the ICC-Maturity Matrix (ICC-MM). ICC: inherited cardiac condition
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The iterative review process to develop the ICC-MM. aParticipants were allocated to multidisciplinary groups. ICC-MM: inherited cardiac condition-Maturity Matrix
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean scores across all sites for all domains 2009 and 2011.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Domain A, an accessible inherited cardiac conditions service, with a clearly articulated model of service provision: mean scores across all sites for each indicator.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Domain B, a communicated and coordinated service, where the structure of the service is understood by all: mean scores across all sites for each indicator.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Domain C, family-centred care: mean scores across all sites for each indicator.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Domain D, a sustainable and ethical service: mean scores across all sites for each indicator.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Domain E, valuing the knowledge base, with a philosophy that embraces qualitative and quantitative evidence: mean scores across all sites for each indicator. BHF: British Heart Foundation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wung S-F, Hickey K, Taylor J, et al. Cardiovascular genomics. J Nurs Scholarship 2013; 45: 60–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium. Large-scale association analysis identifies new risk loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 25–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burton H, Alberg C, Stewart A. Heart to heart. Inherited cardiovascular conditions services. A needs assessment and service review. Cambridge, UK: PHG Foundation; 2009.
    1. Kim L, Devereux R, Basson C. Impact of genetic insights into Mendelian disease on cardiovascular clinical practice. Circulation 2011; 123: 544–550. - PubMed
    1. Behr E, Dalageorgou C, Christiansen M, et al. Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: Familial evaluation identifies inheritable heart disease in the majority of families. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1670–1680. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms