Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;251(10):2471-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2452-y. Epub 2013 Sep 8.

Extraction of retinal tacks from subjects implanted with an epiretinal visual prosthesis

Affiliations

Extraction of retinal tacks from subjects implanted with an epiretinal visual prosthesis

Eugene de Juan Jr et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Retinal tacks, first developed for the treatment of complex retinal detachments, have more recently been used for the fixation of epiretinal electrode arrays as part of implanted visual prostheses. Here, we report on the clinical experience of extracting four such tacks after chronic implantation. The ability to safely extract retinal tacks ensures that epiretinal devices can be repositioned or removed if necessary.

Methods: Custom-built, titanium alloy retinal tacks were mechanically removed from the posterior coats after prolonged implantation (up to 19 months). The resulting wound was characterized by clinical evaluation, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography while being monitored for stability over time. The wounds were also compared to earlier published reports of the healing response around retinal tacks in human subjects.

Results: Tack extraction was accomplished successfully, without complication, in all four subjects. The wound site was readily identified by pale scar tissue. No change in the wound size or appearance was noted over many months of post-operative observation (up to 22 months after explant). No adverse effects on overall ocular health were detected.

Conclusion: Extraction of retinal tacks from subjects implanted with epiretinal prostheses can be performed without significant complication. The long-term healing response appears to be stable and localized in eyes afflicted with retinitis pigmentosa or choroideremia. There was also minimal, if any, impact on the local circulatory system. These cases suggest that the use of retinal tacks for anchoring epiretinal visual prostheses does not preclude safe repositioning or removal of the device more than a year after implant.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00407602.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Proprietary Interests: EdeJ, RS, POB and LdaC belong to institutions that receive funding from Second Sight Medical Products to support the study. Only EdeJ has a financial interest in Second Sight Medical Products. JN is an employee of and has a financial interest in Second Sight Medical Products. The authors have full control of all primary data and they agree to allow Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review their data upon request.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Argus II Retinal Tack
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fundus color photograph, post-extraction, Case 1. (a) 3 months. (b) 12 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fluorescein angiogram 3 months post-extraction, late phase, Case 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fundus color photograph, post-extraction, Case 2. (a) 1 month. (b) 16 months.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Fluorescein angiogram 16 months post-extraction, venous phase, Case 2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fundus color photograph, post-extraction, Case 3. (a) 3 months. (b) 22 months.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Fundus color photograph, post-extraction, Case 4. (a) 1 week. (b) 21 months.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Fluorescein angiogram 21 months post-extraction, late phase, Case 4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ando F, Kondo J. A Plastic Tack for the Treatment of Retinal Detachment With Giant Tear. American J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:260–261. - PubMed
    1. Brown GC. The use of tacks for the repair of complicated retinal detachment. Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1987;39:578–582. - PubMed
    1. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J, Mech B, Cimmarusti V, Van Boemel G, Dagnelie G, de Juan E. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vis Res. 2003;43:2573–2581. - PubMed
    1. Gerding H, Benner F, Taneri S. Experimental implantation of epiretinal implants (EPI-RET) with an IOL-type receiver. J Neural Eng. 2007;4:S38–S49. - PubMed
    1. Sachs HG, Gabel VP. Retinal replacement - the development of microelectronic retinal prostheses - experience with subretinal implants and new aspects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:717–723. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources