Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;28(10):2604-12.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft287. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Conservative care in Europe--nephrologists' experience with the decision not to start renal replacement therapy

Moniek W M van de Luijtgaarden  1 , Marlies Noordzij, Wim van Biesen, Cecile Couchoud, Giovanni Cancarini, Willem-Jan W Bos, Friedo W Dekker, Jose L Gorriz, Christos Iatrou, Christoph Wanner, Patrik Finne, Olivera Stojceva-Taneva, Svjetlana Cala, Vianda S Stel, Charles Tomson, Kitty J Jager
Affiliations

Conservative care in Europe--nephrologists' experience with the decision not to start renal replacement therapy

Moniek W M van de Luijtgaarden et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: For some patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), providing conservative care until death may be an acceptable alternative for renal replacement therapy (RRT). We aimed to estimate the occurrence of conservative care in Europe and evaluated opinions about which factors nephrologists consider important in their decision not to offer RRT.

Methods: With a web-based survey sent to nephrologists in 11 European countries, we inquired how often RRT was not started in 2009 and how specific factors would influence the nephrologists' decision to provide conservative care. We compared subgroups by nephrologist and facility characteristics using chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: We received 433 responses. Nephrologists decided to offer conservative care in 10% of their patients [interquartile range (IQR) 5-20%]. An additional 5% (IQR 2-10%) of the patients chose conservative care as they refused when nephrologists intended to start RRT. Patient preference (93%), severe clinical conditions (93%), vascular dementia (84%) and low physical functional status (75%) were considered extremely or quite important in the nephrologists' decision to provide conservative care. Nephrologists from countries with a low incidence of RRT, not-for-profit centres and public centres more often scored these factors as extremely or quite important than their counterparts from high-incidence countries, for-profit centres and private centres.

Conclusions: Nephrologists estimated conservative care was provided to up to 15% of their patients in 2009. The presence of severe clinical conditions, vascular dementia and a low physical functional status are important factors in the decision-making not to start RRT. Patient preference was considered as a very important factor, confirming the importance of extensive patient education and shared decision-making.

Keywords: conservative care; dialysis; end-stage renal disease; opinions; renal replacement therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer