Deep sedation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients
- PMID: 24013702
- DOI: 10.1007/s10840-013-9817-3
Deep sedation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. AF incidence increases with age. AF ablation procedures are routinely performed under deep sedation with propofol. The purpose of the study was to evaluate if propofol deep sedation during AF ablation is safe in elderly patients.
Methods: Four hundred one consecutive patients (mean age, 61.4 ± 11.1 years; range, 20-82; 66.3 % men) who were presented to our institution for ablation of symptomatic AF were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: Patients in group A were ≤50 years old; patients in group B were 51-74 years old; and patients in group C were ≥75 years old. Procedures were performed under deep sedation with propofol, midazolam, and piritramide. SaO2, electrocardiogram, arterial blood pressure, and arterial blood gas were monitored throughout the procedure. Sedation-related complications, intraprocedural complications, and other adverse events were evaluated. Fisher exact or χ (2) tests were used for comparison of adverse events and complications among groups. Analysis of variance was used to compare sedation- and procedure-related parameters.
Results: Fifty-three (13.2 %) elderly patients were in group C and were compared to 73 (18.2 %) patients in group A and 275 (68.8 %) in group B. No significant differences in sedation-related or intraprocedural complications were seen (group A, 1.4 %; group B, 1.1 %; group C, 3.7 %; p = 0.336). Despite a significantly greater drop in systolic blood pressure in under sedation in group C (group A, 15.5 ± 9.5 mmHg; group B, 18.9 ± 16.3 mmHg; group C, 32.3 ± 15.5 mmHg; p < 0.001), no prolonged hypotension was observed. The rate of other adverse events (delirium, respiratory infection, renal failure) was significantly higher in group C (9.4 %), compared to group A (0 %) and group B (2.2 %; p = 0.004).
Conclusion: Deep sedation with propofol and midazolam during AF ablation did not result in an increased rate in sedation-related complications in elderly patients. Similarly, the rate of procedural complications was not significantly different among the study groups. The rate of respiratory infections and renal failure was significantly higher in the elderly. All adverse events were treated successfully without any remaining sequelae.
Similar articles
-
Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists without assisted ventilation for long cardiac interventions: an assessment of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace. 2012 Mar;14(3):325-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur328. Epub 2011 Oct 23. Europace. 2012. PMID: 22024600
-
Safety aspects of deep sedation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan;35(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03260.x. Epub 2011 Nov 6. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22054234
-
Predictive Factors and Safety of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Combination With Propofol Deep Sedation in Left Atrial Ablation Procedures.Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 15;124(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 25. Am J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31109635
-
Catheter ablation versus anti-arrhythmic drug therapy for the management of a trial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;41(3):267-72. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9945-4. Epub 2014 Dec 4. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25465209 Review.
-
Optimization of procedural sedation and analgesia during atrial fibrillation ablation.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;36(3):354-360. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001263. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 36994742 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation as general anesthesia airway managements for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;67(6):1377-1390. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01742-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38225533
-
Feasibility of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec 2. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01961-1. Online ahead of print. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 39623098
-
The Practice of Deep Sedation in Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Laboratories: Results of an Italian Survey Promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing).J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5035. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215035. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768557 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing between second-generation cryoballoon vs open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients: Acute and long-term outcomes.Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):500-507. doi: 10.1002/clc.23335. Epub 2020 Jan 14. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31943264 Free PMC article.
-
Conscious sedation with the combination of midazolam and fentanyl is effective and safe for cryoablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Dec;20(4):468-473. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.144976. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024. PMID: 39897003 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical