Editorial
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504.
Epub 2013 Aug 27.
Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters
Collaborators
- PMID: 24013839
- PMCID: PMC3754890
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters
PLoS Med.
2013 Aug.
Abstract
The PLOS Medicine Editors announce the launch of a Reporting Guidelines Collection to coincide with the Seventh International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, to be held September 8–10, 2013, in Chicago.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Conflict of interest statement
The authors' individual competing interests are at
Similar articles
-
In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters.Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012 May 1;302(9):F1067-8. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00138.2012. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012. PMID: 22419693 No abstract available.
-
Commentary.Biostatistics. 2010 Jul;11(3):389-90. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq030. Biostatistics. 2010. PMID: 20538874 No abstract available.
-
Discussion of Keiding.Biostatistics. 2010 Jul;11(3):393-4. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq032. Biostatistics. 2010. PMID: 20538876 No abstract available.
-
The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;116:617-31. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 20. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016. PMID: 26970645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rigour in quantitative research.Nurs Stand. 2015 Jul 22;29(47):43-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.47.43.e8820. Nurs Stand. 2015. PMID: 26198528 Review.
Cited by
-
Randomized controlled comparison of cross-sectional survey approaches to optimize follow-up completeness in clinical studies.PLoS One. 2019 Mar 18;14(3):e0213822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213822. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30883589 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Completeness of Follow-Up Determines Validity of Study Findings: Results of a Prospective Repeated Measures Cohort Study.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140817. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26469346 Free PMC article.
-
Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299806. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38421981 Free PMC article.
-
Rigor, Transparency, and Reporting Social Science Research: Why Guidelines Don't Have to Kill Your Story.Res Soc Work Pract. 2017 Jul;27(4):487-493. doi: 10.1177/1049731515622264. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Res Soc Work Pract. 2017. PMID: 28706432 Free PMC article.
-
Self-perception of the acquisition of transferable competencies by the participants in a research congress for undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study.Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27283. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27283. eCollection 2024 Mar 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38509993 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Available: http://www.peerreviewcongress.org/index.html. Accessed 17 July 2013.
-
- PLOS Medicine (2013) Reporting Guidelines Collection homepage. Available: http://www.ploscollections.org/reportingguidelines
-
- Chalmers I (1990) Underreporting Research is Scientific Misconduct. JAMA 263 (10) 1405–1408. - PubMed
-
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med 4 (10) e296 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, et al. (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med 4 (10) e297 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
