Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;12(2):229-44.
doi: 10.1007/s12021-013-9204-3.

A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging

Affiliations
Review

A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging

Benson Mwangi et al. Neuroinformatics. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Machine learning techniques are increasingly being used in making relevant predictions and inferences on individual subjects neuroimaging scan data. Previous studies have mostly focused on categorical discrimination of patients and matched healthy controls and more recently, on prediction of individual continuous variables such as clinical scores or age. However, these studies are greatly hampered by the large number of predictor variables (voxels) and low observations (subjects) also known as the curse-of-dimensionality or small-n-large-p problem. As a result, feature reduction techniques such as feature subset selection and dimensionality reduction are used to remove redundant predictor variables and experimental noise, a process which mitigates the curse-of-dimensionality and small-n-large-p effects. Feature reduction is an essential step before training a machine learning model to avoid overfitting and therefore improving model prediction accuracy and generalization ability. In this review, we discuss feature reduction techniques used with machine learning in neuroimaging studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Feature reduction without double-dipping. Training and testing datasets are separated before the feature reduction process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Feature reduction with double-dipping. Features are selected from the same set of training and testing data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram illustrating the recursive feature elimination (RFE) process.

References

    1. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95–113. - PubMed
    1. Ashburner J. Computational anatomy with the SPM software. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2009;27:1163–1174. - PubMed
    1. Ashburner J, Friston K. Voxel-Based Morphometry-The methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11:805–821. - PubMed
    1. Allen EA, Erhardt EB, Damaraju E, Gruner W, Segall JM, Silva RF, Havlicek M, Rachakonda S, Fries J, Kalyanam R, Michael AM, Caprihan A, Turner JA, Eichele T, Adelsheim S, Bryan AD, Bustillo J, Clark VP, Ewing SWF, Filbey F, Ford CC, Hutchison K, Jung RE, Kiehl KA, Kodituwakku P, Komesu YM, Mayer AR, Pearlson GD, Phillips JR, Sadek JR, Michael S, Teuscher U, Thoma RJ, Calhoun VD. A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2011;5:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balci S, Sabuncu M, Yoo J, Gosh S, Gabrieli W, Gabrieli J, Golland P. Prediction of Successful Memory Encoding from fMRI Data. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11:97–104. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources