Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):15591-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308560110. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Nuclear quantum effects and hydrogen bond fluctuations in water

Affiliations

Nuclear quantum effects and hydrogen bond fluctuations in water

Michele Ceriotti et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The hydrogen bond (HB) is central to our understanding of the properties of water. However, despite intense theoretical and experimental study, it continues to hold some surprises. Here, we show from an analysis of ab initio simulations that take proper account of nuclear quantum effects that the hydrogen-bonded protons in liquid water experience significant excursions in the direction of the acceptor oxygen atoms. This generates a small but nonnegligible fraction of transient autoprotolysis events that are not seen in simulations with classical nuclei. These events are associated with major rearrangements of the electronic density, as revealed by an analysis of the computed Wannier centers and (1)H chemical shifts. We also show that the quantum fluctuations exhibit significant correlations across neighboring HBs, consistent with an ephemeral shuttling of protons along water wires. We end by suggesting possible implications for our understanding of how perturbations (solvated ions, interfaces, and confinement) might affect the HB network in water.

Keywords: ab initio liquid water; generalized Langevin equation thermostat; path integral molecular dynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Joint probability density P(ν, cosα) of finding an O–H–O′ geometry with a given να configuration in a classical simulation of ab initio water at 300 K and the experimental density, normalized over its maximum Pmax. One can clearly identify a cluster of hydrogen-bonded configurations (a) and a cluster corresponding to the other first neighbors of the tagged molecule (b). Features at more negative values of ν are less clear-cut (c). They correspond to farther neighbors and are irrelevant to the present work. The red line marks the dividing surface one should ideally use to define the hydrogen-bonded region, which is obtained by moving away from the saddle point on the probability distribution in the direction of the negative eigenvector of the Hessian.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(A) Distribution of the proton-transfer coordinate in ab initio simulations of water at 300 K. The three curves correspond to a classical simulation, to the distribution of the ring polymer beads in a simulation that includes quantum effects, and to the distribution of the centroid of the ring polymer in the quantum simulation. (B) Conditional average of the gyration radius of the ring polymer in the directions parallel formula image and perpendicular formula image to the O–H covalent bond for different values of ν for the centroid.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(A) Distribution of the proton-transfer coordinate ν for water at different thermodynamic state points. (B–D) Joint probability distribution of the proton-transfer coordinate and the distance d(O–O′) between the covalently bound and acceptor oxygen atoms: (B) classical nuclei, formula image, formula image; (C) quantum nuclei, formula image, formula image; and (D) quantum nuclei, formula image, formula image.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Given a tagged H atom, the oxygen atom O it is covalently bound to, and the acceptor atom O′, X and X′ are the Wannier centers of the two O atoms that are closest to H. The plots report the joint probability distribution of ν and of the distances of the Wannier centers to the corresponding O. A classical simulation of liquid water (Upper) and a simulation that includes NQEs (Lower) are shown.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Compact illustration of the relation between the instantaneous chemical shift and the structural properties of the O–H bond at three different thermodynamic state points: the liquid at formula image and formula image (blue), supercritical water at formula image and formula image (red), and an isolated gas-phase water molecule at 473 K (black). In all cases, NQEs were included using PIGLET. The continuous lines correspond to conditional averages of the chemical shift as a function of the structural parameter, the dashed lines delimit the area within 1 standard deviation from the mean, and the shading is proportional to the probability distribution of the structural parameter. The dots indicate the means of the structural parameter and the chemical shift. (A) Proton-transfer coordinate ν is used as the structural parameter, the gas-phase molecule corresponding to an asymptotic value of formula image. (B) Covalent bond length formula image is used.

References

    1. Eisenberg D, Kauzmann W (1968) The Structure and Properties of Water (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford)
    1. Pauling L (1960) The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals: An Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry (Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NY), Vol 18.
    1. Silvestrelli PL, Parrinello M. Structural, electronic, and bonding properties of liquid water from first principles. J Chem Phys. 1999;111(8):3572–3580.
    1. Sharma M, Resta R, Car R. Intermolecular dynamical charge fluctuations in water: A signature of the H-bond network. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(18):187401. - PubMed
    1. Boero M, Terakura K, Ikeshoji T, Liew CC, Parrinello M. Hydrogen bonding and dipole moment of water at supercritical conditions: A first-principles molecular dynamics study. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;85(15):3245–3248. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources