Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk
- PMID: 2401652
- DOI: 10.2527/1990.6882297x
Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk
Abstract
Biological efficiency of beef production to weaning and to slaughter was estimated in three groups of cattle reasonably similar in growth and mature size but different in the amount of milk available to the calves (low (L) = Hereford x Angus, medium (M) = Red Poll x Angus and high (H) = Milking Shorthorn x Angus). Efficiency was defined as the ratio of estimated kilograms of calf weight weaned or carcass weight produced by a herd of 100 first-cross cows to estimated metabolizable energy (ME) intake by the cows and preweaning non-milk ME intake by the calves or preweaning non-milk and postweaning ME intake by the calves. Efficiencies were estimated assuming observed and average reproductive rates, and using observed energy requirements for maintenance, as well as the same requirements for maintenance in the M and H groups. With the observed reproductive rates and requirements for maintenance, efficiencies to weaning and to slaughter were 28.1, 27.4 and 27.4 g weaning weight per Mcal ME and 22.0, 20.6 and 20.3 g carcass weight per Mcal ME for the L, M and H groups, respectively. With average requirements for maintenance, efficiencies were 28.2 and 27.5 to weaning and 20.8 and 20.4 to slaughter for the M and H groups, respectively. Under equal reproductive rates and observed maintenance requirements, efficiencies were 28.3, 27.2 and 27.7 to weaning, and 22.1, 20.6 and 20.6 to slaughter for the L, M and H groups, respectively. With average maintenance requirements, efficiencies were 27.5 and 27.4 to weaning and 20.7 and 20.5 to slaughter for the M and H groups, respectively. Across the production output and input assumption scenarios, the L group consistently was the most efficient, especially when evaluated at slaughter of calves.
Similar articles
-
Economical and biological efficiencies of beef cattle differing in level of milk production.J Anim Sci. 1993 Jan;71(1):44-50. doi: 10.2527/1993.71144x. J Anim Sci. 1993. PMID: 8454551
-
Energy requirements for maintenance of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk.J Anim Sci. 1990 Aug;68(8):2279-88. doi: 10.2527/1990.6882279x. J Anim Sci. 1990. PMID: 2401650
-
Preweaning performance and body composition of calves from straightbred Nellore and Bos taurus x Nellore crosses.J Anim Sci. 2009 May;87(5):1814-20. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0758. Epub 2009 Jan 2. J Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 19122045
-
Cow/calf preweaning efficiency of Nellore and Bos taurus x Bos indicus crosses.J Anim Sci. 2009 Feb;87(2):740-7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0759. Epub 2008 Oct 24. J Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 18952743
-
Energy Requirements of Beef Cattle: Current Energy Systems and Factors Influencing Energy Requirements for Maintenance.Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;11(6):1642. doi: 10.3390/ani11061642. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34206042 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of cow milk production on cow-calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills.Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 22;4(Suppl 1):S145-S148. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa123. eCollection 2020 Dec. Transl Anim Sci. 2020. PMID: 33381739 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of Strategies to Improve the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Cow-Calf Production Systems.Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 5;12(3):385. doi: 10.3390/ani12030385. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35158708 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources