Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri
- PMID: 24018076
- PMCID: PMC3771758
- DOI: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri
Abstract
Background and objectives: We sought to examine the outcomes of patients with myomatous uteri weighing >1000 g who underwent hysterectomy by one of two modalities, either with a robotic system or by laparotomy.
Methods: All patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >1000 g at our institution between May 2007 and January 2011 were identified, and a retrospective chart review was performed. These patients were matched to a laparotomy control group by body mass index and uterine weight, and the postoperative outcomes in both groups were analyzed and compared.
Results: Sixty patients with uteri weighing >1000 g underwent hysterectomy, 30 with the robotic system and 30 by laparotomy. The median body mass index was 31.8 kg/m(2) (range, 18.5-56.3 kg/m(2)) and the median uterine weight was 1259 g (range, >1000 -3543 g) in the robotic group versus 30.2 kg/m(2) (range, 18 - 48 kg/m(2)) and 1509 g (range, 1000 -3570 g), respectively, in the laparotomy group (P = .31). The median operating time was 255 minutes (range, 180 -372 minutes) in the robotic group versus 150 minutes (range, 100 -285 minutes) in the laparotomy group (P < .001). There were no conversions to laparotomy. In both groups the operative time was not increased with increasing specimen weight. The median blood loss was 150 mL in the robotic group versus 425 mL in the laparotomy group. Of 30 patients in the robotic group, 23 (76.6%) were discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 1. The median hospital stay for the robotic group was 1 day, and for the laparotomy group, it was 2.5 days (P < .01).
Conclusion: Robotic surgeries for very large myomatous uteri are feasible and have minimal morbidity even in morbidly obese patients. The robotic surgery requires a longer operative time but results in a shorter hospital stay and decreased intraoperative blood loss.
Similar articles
-
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 29453729
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 28711761
-
Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.J Robot Surg. 2017 Dec;11(4):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0674-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 28144809
-
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for the larger uterus (>500 g): a case series and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4237-0. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 27848016 Review.
-
Robotic live donor hysterectomy.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021 Dec 1;26(6):640-645. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000926. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021. PMID: 34593704 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2415-2419. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01673-0. Epub 2023 Jul 11. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37434073
-
Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56602. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38646385 Free PMC article.
-
Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy as a Suitable Choice of Hysterectomy for Large Myoma Uteri: Literature Review.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:6945061. doi: 10.1155/2016/6945061. Epub 2016 Jan 27. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26925276 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):518-528. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23132. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37465847 Free PMC article.
-
Early Experience of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Uterine Disease.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;38(9):450-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592345. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 27643518 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:34.e1–34.e7 - PubMed
-
- Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano GF. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:270–275 - PubMed
-
- Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Ragusa G, Cavallo M, Pardi G. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:620–625 - PubMed
-
- Wattiez A, Soriano D, Fiaccavento A, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very enlarged uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:125–130 - PubMed
-
- Fiaccavento A, Landi S, Barbieri F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of very large uteri: a retrospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:559–563 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical