Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):450-3.
doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422522079.

Laparoscopic undiversion in a child with sacral agenesis into augmentation cystoplasty

Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic undiversion in a child with sacral agenesis into augmentation cystoplasty

Manickam Ramalingam et al. JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: In neurogenic bladder with compromised renal function or when complex reconstruction is not preferred, ileal conduit is considered. Undiversion is performed when the patient prefers the procedure, once the renal function improves, or when complications resulting from diversion are present.

Case description: We present the case of a 10-y-old boy with sacral agenesis, who underwent laparoscopic-assisted ileal conduit diversion in 2006, because he had a grossly unstable, small-capacity bladder and was not compliant with intermittent self-catheterization. At present, he preferred not to have a conduit.

Discussion: Laparoscopic undiversion with ileal augmentation cystoplasty was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and he is now on intermittent self-catheterization with healthy renal function. Laparoscopic undiversion is technically challenging, yet feasible, and is an effective option in children. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CT urogram showing the conduit and both kidneys (note the thin parenchyma in the left kidney).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Image showing port positions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Stoma being released.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Ileo cystoplasty (anastomosis in progress).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Completed augmented cystoplasty (note the suprapubic Foley catheter).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Postoperative cystogram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDougal WS. Use of intestinal segments and urinary diversion. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Jr., Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's Urology, 8th ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002;3771
    1. Hendren WH. Urinary tract refunctionalisation after long term undiversion: a 20-year experience with 177 patients. Ann Surg. 1990;212:478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramalingam M, Senthil K, Pai MG. Modified technique of laparoscopy-assisted surgeries (transportal). J Endourol. 2008;22:2681–2685 - PubMed
    1. Robertson CN, King LR. Bladder substitution in children. Urol Clin North Am. 1986;13:333–344 - PubMed
    1. Wolf JS, Jr., Taheri PA. Laparoscopic urinary undiversion. J Urol. 1998;159:198–199 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources