Measuring quality of care: considering conceptual approaches to quality indicator development and evaluation
- PMID: 24018342
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.017
Measuring quality of care: considering conceptual approaches to quality indicator development and evaluation
Abstract
Objective: In this article, we describe one approach for developing and evaluating quality indicators.
Study design and setting: We focus on describing different conceptual approaches to quality indicator development, review one approach for developing quality indicators, outline how to evaluate quality indicators once developed, and discuss quality indicator maintenance.
Results: The key steps for developing quality indicators include specifying a clear goal for the indicators; using methodologies to incorporate evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives; and considering contextual factors and logistics of implementation. The Strategic Framework Board and the National Quality Measure Clearinghouse have developed criteria for evaluating quality indicators that complement traditional psychometric evaluations. Optimal strategies for quality indicator maintenance and dissemination have not been determined, but experiences with clinical guideline maintenance may be informative.
Conclusion: For quality indicators to effectively guide quality improvement efforts, they must be developed, evaluated, maintained, and implemented using rigorous evidence-informed practices.
Keywords: Consensus; Health care; Models; Quality indicators; Quality of health care; Reproducibility of results; Theoretical.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1338-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Sep 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 24018346 No abstract available.
-
The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus.J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):963-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 29. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24786596 No abstract available.
-
Letter reply to Kris Doggen et al.: The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators.J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):964-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 May 15. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24837297 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Measuring quality of care: considering measurement frameworks and needs assessment to guide quality indicator development.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Sep 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 24018344
-
Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 16;20(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05665-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32938461 Free PMC article.
-
Prioritizing quality indicator development across the healthcare system: identifying what to measure.Intern Med J. 2009 Oct;39(10):648-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01733.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. Intern Med J. 2009. PMID: 19371394 Review.
-
Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators.Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Apr;27(2):137-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv004. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015. PMID: 25758443
-
Painting by numbers: a guide for systematically developing indicators of performance at any level of health care.Health Policy. 2012 Nov;108(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 9. Health Policy. 2012. PMID: 22883386
Cited by
-
Validation of quality indicators for end-of-life communication: results of a multicentre survey.CMAJ. 2017 Jul 31;189(30):E980-E989. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160515. CMAJ. 2017. PMID: 28760834 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials: a protocol.BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e008819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008819. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26351189 Free PMC article.
-
Nationwide consensus on quality indicators to assess glaucoma care: A modified Delphi approach.Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;34(1):217-225. doi: 10.1177/11206721231170033. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 37069806 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand.BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e030076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030076. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30928966 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic approach to evaluating and confirming the utility of a suite of national health system performance (HSP) indicators in Canada: a modified Delphi study.BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 12;7(4):e014772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014772. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28404612 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources