Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;45(12):983-8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344617. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening

Affiliations

Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening

Vani J A Konda et al. Endoscopy. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background and study aims: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has a dismal prognosis unless treated early or prevented at the precursor stage of Barrett's esophagus-associated dysplasia. However, some patients with cancer or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (DBE) may not be captured by current screening and surveillance programs. Additional screening techniques are needed to determine who would benefit from endoscopic screening or surveillance. Partial wave spectroscopy (PWS) microscopy (also known as nanocytology) measures the disorder strength (Ld ), a statistic that characterizes the spatial distribution of the intracellular mass at the nanoscale level and thus provides insights into the cell nanoscale architecture beyond that which is revealed by conventional microscopy. The aim of the present study was to compare the disorder strength measured by PWS in normal squamous epithelium in the proximal esophagus to determine whether nanoscale architectural differences are detectable in the field area of EAC and Barrett's esophagus.

Methods: During endoscopy, proximal esophageal squamous cells were obtained by brushings and were fixed in alcohol and stained with standard hematoxylin and Cyto-Stain. The disorder strength of these sampled squamous cells was determined by PWS.

Results: A total of 75 patient samples were analyzed, 15 of which were pathologically confirmed as EAC, 13 were DBE, and 15 were non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus; 32 of the patients, most of whom had reflux symptoms, acted as controls. The mean disorder strength per patient in cytologically normal squamous cells in the proximal esophagus of patients with EAC was 1.79-times higher than that of controls (P<0.01). Patients with DBE also had a disorder strength 1.63-times higher than controls (P<0.01).

Conclusion: Intracellular nanoarchitectural changes were found in the proximal squamous epithelium in patients harboring distal EAC and DBE using PWS. Advances in this technology and the biological phenomenon of the field effect of carcinogenesis revealed in this study may lead to a useful tool in non-invasive screening practices in DBE and EAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bright field image and a corresponding color-coded map of disorder strength (Ld), as assessed by partial wave spectroscopy (PWS) for representative normal-looking cells from the proximal esophagus. a Patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma. b Control patient.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Normalized disorder strength in the proximal esophagus of patients undergoing partial wave spectroscopy. There was a stepwise progression that correlated with histological stage. Furthermore, differences between dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and controls and between cancer and controls were statistically significant (P <0.01 and P <0.01, respectively). The median is designated as the line in middle of the box. The upper limit of the box refers to the 75th percentile and the lower limit of the box refers to the 25th percentile. Maximum and minimum values excluding outliers (shown as dots) are shown with the capped lines.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of partial wave spectroscopy for the detection of esophageal cancer or dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. The area under the ROC curve was 0.816 (95% confidence interval 0.704–0.928) for the detection of cancer or dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean normalized disorder strength in the buccal mucosa between those patients with cancer and controls (P =0.38). EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma. The median is designated as the line in middle of the box. The upper limit of the box refers to the 75th percentile and the lower limit of the box refers to the 25th percentile. Maximum and minimum values excluding outliers (shown as dots) are shown with the capped lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Konda VJ, Dalal K. Optimal management of Barrett’s esophagus: pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011;7:447–458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerson LB, Shetler K, Triadafilopoulos G. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in asymptomatic individuals. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:461–467. - PubMed
    1. Sharma P, Sidorenko EI. Are screening and surveillance for Barrett’s oesophagus really worthwhile? Gut. 2005;54 (Suppl 1):i27–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1375–1383. - PubMed
    1. Wani S, Falk G, Hall M, et al. Patients with nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus have low risks for developing dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:220–227. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms