Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening
- PMID: 24019132
- PMCID: PMC4195538
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344617
Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening
Abstract
Background and study aims: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has a dismal prognosis unless treated early or prevented at the precursor stage of Barrett's esophagus-associated dysplasia. However, some patients with cancer or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (DBE) may not be captured by current screening and surveillance programs. Additional screening techniques are needed to determine who would benefit from endoscopic screening or surveillance. Partial wave spectroscopy (PWS) microscopy (also known as nanocytology) measures the disorder strength (Ld ), a statistic that characterizes the spatial distribution of the intracellular mass at the nanoscale level and thus provides insights into the cell nanoscale architecture beyond that which is revealed by conventional microscopy. The aim of the present study was to compare the disorder strength measured by PWS in normal squamous epithelium in the proximal esophagus to determine whether nanoscale architectural differences are detectable in the field area of EAC and Barrett's esophagus.
Methods: During endoscopy, proximal esophageal squamous cells were obtained by brushings and were fixed in alcohol and stained with standard hematoxylin and Cyto-Stain. The disorder strength of these sampled squamous cells was determined by PWS.
Results: A total of 75 patient samples were analyzed, 15 of which were pathologically confirmed as EAC, 13 were DBE, and 15 were non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus; 32 of the patients, most of whom had reflux symptoms, acted as controls. The mean disorder strength per patient in cytologically normal squamous cells in the proximal esophagus of patients with EAC was 1.79-times higher than that of controls (P<0.01). Patients with DBE also had a disorder strength 1.63-times higher than controls (P<0.01).
Conclusion: Intracellular nanoarchitectural changes were found in the proximal squamous epithelium in patients harboring distal EAC and DBE using PWS. Advances in this technology and the biological phenomenon of the field effect of carcinogenesis revealed in this study may lead to a useful tool in non-invasive screening practices in DBE and EAC.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Expression profiles of cancer stem cell markers: CD133, CD44, Musashi-1 and EpCAM in the cardiac mucosa-Barrett's esophagus-early esophageal adenocarcinoma-advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma sequence.Pathol Res Pract. 2017 Mar;213(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 30. Pathol Res Pract. 2017. PMID: 28216140
-
Structural alterations of the mucosa stroma in the Barrett's esophagus metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;27(9):1498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07179.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012. PMID: 22591183
-
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Marker of Progression from Non-Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):8-18. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04456-x. Epub 2019 Nov 19. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020. PMID: 31745889
-
The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus.Adv Surg. 1999;33:29-68. Adv Surg. 1999. PMID: 10572561 Review.
-
Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus: Is It Cost-Effective?Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Aug;63(8):2094-2104. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5148-7. Dig Dis Sci. 2018. PMID: 29948571 Review.
Cited by
-
Early detection of lung cancer using artificial intelligence-enhanced optical nanosensing of chromatin alterations in field carcinogenesis.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40550-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37608214 Free PMC article.
-
Spatiotemporal Study of a Risk-Stratification Epigenetic-Based Biomarker Assay in Patients With Barrett Esophagus.Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 12;120(6):1285-1295. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003367. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 39933887 Free PMC article.
-
Disorder strength measured by quantitative phase imaging as intrinsic cancer marker in fixed tissue biopsies.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0194320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194320. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29561905 Free PMC article.
-
The Global Relationship between Chromatin Physical Topology, Fractal Structure, and Gene Expression.Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 24;7:41061. doi: 10.1038/srep41061. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28117353 Free PMC article.
-
Probing Field Cancerization in the Gastrointestinal Tract Using a Hybrid Raman and Partial Wave Spectroscopy Microscope.Anal Chem. 2025 Jun 24;97(24):12642-12653. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00954. Epub 2025 Jun 11. Anal Chem. 2025. PMID: 40497475 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gerson LB, Shetler K, Triadafilopoulos G. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in asymptomatic individuals. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:461–467. - PubMed
-
- Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1375–1383. - PubMed
-
- Wani S, Falk G, Hall M, et al. Patients with nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus have low risks for developing dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:220–227. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials