Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3711-8.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6125. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

End points and trial design in geriatric oncology research: a joint European organisation for research and treatment of cancer--Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology--International Society Of Geriatric Oncology position article

Affiliations

End points and trial design in geriatric oncology research: a joint European organisation for research and treatment of cancer--Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology--International Society Of Geriatric Oncology position article

Hans Wildiers et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Selecting the most appropriate end points for clinical trials is important to assess the value of new treatment strategies. Well-established end points for clinical research exist in oncology but may not be as relevant to the older cancer population because of competing risks of death and potentially increased impact of therapy on global functioning and quality of life. This article discusses specific clinical end points and their advantages and disadvantages for older individuals. Randomized or single-arm phase II trials can provide insight into the range of efficacy and toxicity in older populations but ideally need to be confirmed in phase III trials, which are unfortunately often hindered by the severe heterogeneity of the older cancer population, difficulties with selection bias depending on inclusion criteria, physician perception, and barriers in willingness to participate. All clinical trials in oncology should be without an upper age limit to allow entry of eligible older adults. In settings where so-called standard therapy is not feasible, specific trials for older patients with cancer might be required, integrating meaningful measures of outcome. Not all questions can be answered in randomized clinical trials, and large observational cohort studies or registries within the community setting should be established (preferably in parallel to randomized trials) so that treatment patterns across different settings can be compared with impact on outcome. Obligatory integration of a comparable form of geriatric assessment is recommended in future studies, and regulatory organizations such as the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration should require adequate collection of data on efficacy and toxicity of new drugs in fit and frail elderly subpopulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • On lumping, splitting, and the nosology of clinical trial populations and end points.
    Mell LK, Zakeri K, Rose BS. Mell LK, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1089-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4429. Epub 2014 Feb 18. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24550413 No abstract available.
  • Reply to L.K. Mell et al.
    Ballman KV, Mauer M, Wedding U, Mohile SG, Muss H, Extermann M, Luciani A, Cohen HJ, Hurria A, Lichtman SM, Curigliano G, Wildiers H. Ballman KV, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1090-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.5236. Epub 2014 Feb 18. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24550420 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources