Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;22(5):675-80.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.199. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

Genetic analysis of dyslexia candidate genes in the European cross-linguistic NeuroDys cohort

Affiliations

Genetic analysis of dyslexia candidate genes in the European cross-linguistic NeuroDys cohort

Jessica Becker et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 May.

Abstract

Dyslexia is one of the most common childhood disorders with a prevalence of around 5-10% in school-age children. Although an important genetic component is known to have a role in the aetiology of dyslexia, we are far from understanding the molecular mechanisms leading to the disorder. Several candidate genes have been implicated in dyslexia, including DYX1C1, DCDC2, KIAA0319, and the MRPL19/C2ORF3 locus, each with reports of both positive and no replications. We generated a European cross-linguistic sample of school-age children - the NeuroDys cohort - that includes more than 900 individuals with dyslexia, sampled with homogenous inclusion criteria across eight European countries, and a comparable number of controls. Here, we describe association analysis of the dyslexia candidate genes/locus in the NeuroDys cohort. We performed both case-control and quantitative association analyses of single markers and haplotypes previously reported to be dyslexia-associated. Although we observed association signals in samples from single countries, we did not find any marker or haplotype that was significantly associated with either case-control status or quantitative measurements of word-reading or spelling in the meta-analysis of all eight countries combined. Like in other neurocognitive disorders, our findings underline the need for larger sample sizes to validate possibly weak genetic effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Barbaresi WJ, Schaid DJ, Jacobsen SJ. Incidence of reading disability in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-1982, Rochester, Minn. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:1081–1092. - PubMed
    1. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Fletcher JM, Escobar MD. Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. JAMA. 1990;264:998–1002. - PubMed
    1. Shaywitz SE, Fletcher JM, Holahan JM, et al. Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1351–1359. - PubMed
    1. ICD-10-GM Version 2008 Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme, 10Revision - German Modification -; Kapitel V: 192.
    1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. 4th edn.Text Revision, pp 51-52.

Publication types