Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability
- PMID: 2402414
- DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32467-3
Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability
Abstract
Eighty-eight glaucoma patients and 252 normal subjects underwent C-30-2 testing on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. The effect of fixation losses, high false-positive and false-negative response rates on visual field test results was assessed using the mirror image method of detecting asymmetry across the horizontal meridian, and the Humphrey STATPAC pattern standard deviation (PSD) and mean deviation (MD). Glaucoma patients with poor fixation (greater than or equal to 20%) had less depressed fields and fewer localized defects than those with good fixation. Fixation loss did not affect measures of localized defects or generalized depression among normal subjects. High false-positive rates (greater than or equal to 10%) were associated with less-depressed visual fields among glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Visual fields were depressed by an average of 9 dB for glaucoma patients and 7 dB for normal subjects with high false-negative rates (greater than or equal to 33%), when compared with those with low false-negative rates. Apparent localized defects were observed among normal subjects with high false-negative rates. Most of these defects were located in the superior nasal and adjacent arcuate area.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.Ophthalmology. 1997 Jul;104(7):1126-30. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30173-0. Ophthalmology. 1997. PMID: 9224465 Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing.Ophthalmology. 1991 Jan;98(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32339-x. Ophthalmology. 1991. PMID: 2023736
-
Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;106(9):1252-4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140412043. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988. PMID: 3046588
-
Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using a screening program of Humphrey Field Analyzer.Korean J Ophthalmol. 1990 Jun;4(1):23-5. doi: 10.3341/kjo.1990.4.1.23. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1990. PMID: 2214247
-
Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field.Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992 Oct;70(5):665-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02150.x. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992. PMID: 1471493
Cited by
-
The usefulness of the Deep Learning method of variational autoencoder to reduce measurement noise in glaucomatous visual fields.Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64869-6. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32398783 Free PMC article.
-
The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Jul;100(4):313-332. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12551. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Clin Exp Optom. 2017. PMID: 28640951 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].Ophthalmologe. 2012 Apr;109(4):325-36. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2543-x. Ophthalmologe. 2012. PMID: 22527729 German.
-
Is multifocal electroretinography an early predictor of glaucoma?Doc Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;132(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s10633-016-9524-3. Epub 2016 Jan 20. Doc Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26792427
-
Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening.Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul;118(Suppl 2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01378-5. Epub 2021 Apr 21. Ophthalmologe. 2021. PMID: 33881589 Review. English.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous