Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):318-24.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00005.

Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV prevention: a cluster randomized trial

Sean D Young, William G Cumberland, Sung-Jae Lee, Devan Jaganath, Greg Szekeres, Thomas Coates
Randomized Controlled Trial

Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV prevention: a cluster randomized trial

Sean D Young et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Social networking technologies are an emerging tool for HIV prevention.

Objective: To determine whether social networking communities can increase HIV testing among African American and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM).

Design: Randomized, controlled trial with concealed allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01701206).

Setting: Online.

Patients: 112 MSM based in Los Angeles, more than 85% of whom were African American or Latino.

Intervention: Sixteen peer leaders were randomly assigned to deliver information about HIV or general health to participants via Facebook groups over 12 weeks. After participants accepted a request to join the group, participation was voluntary. Group participation and engagement were monitored. Participants could request a free, home-based HIV testing kit and completed questionnaires at baseline and 12-week follow-up.

Measurements: Participant acceptance of and engagement in the intervention and social network participation, rates of home-based HIV testing, and sexual risk behaviors.

Results: Almost 95% of intervention participants and 73% of control participants voluntarily communicated using the social platform. Twenty-five of 57 intervention participants (44%) requested home-based HIV testing kits compared with 11 of 55 control participants (20%) (difference, 24 percentage points [95% CI, 8 to 41 percentage points]). Nine of the 25 intervention participants (36%) who requested the test took it and mailed it back compared with 2 of the 11 control participants (18%) who requested the test. Retention at study follow-up was more than 93%.

Limitation: Only 2 Facebook communities were included for each group.

Conclusion: Social networking communities are acceptable and effective tools to increase home-based HIV testing among at-risk populations.

Primary funding source: National Institute of Mental Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Study flow diagram. Participant flow chart, Los Angeles, CA, 2011.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV Incidence in the United States. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;300(5):520–529. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Los Angeles County Division of HIV and STD Programs. 2012 Annual HIV Surveillance Report. 2013
    1. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 4. New York: Free Press; 1995.
    1. Maiorana A, Kegeles S, Fernandez P, et al. Implementation and evaluation of an HIV/STD intervention in Peru. Eval Program Plann. 2007;30(1):82–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly J, Murphy D, Sikkema K. Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. Lancet. 1997;350:1500–05. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data