Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;59(3):947-57.
doi: 10.1002/hep.26711. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Liver-specific knockout of GRP94 in mice disrupts cell adhesion, activates liver progenitor cells, and accelerates liver tumorigenesis

Affiliations

Liver-specific knockout of GRP94 in mice disrupts cell adhesion, activates liver progenitor cells, and accelerates liver tumorigenesis

Wan-Ting Chen et al. Hepatology. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Liver cancer is one of the most common solid tumors, with poor prognosis and high mortality. Mutation or deletion of the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) is strongly correlated with human liver cancer. Glucose-regulated protein 94 (GRP94) is a major endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone protein, but its in vivo function is still emerging. To study the role of GRP94 in maintaining liver homeostasis and tumor development, we created two liver-specific knockout mouse models with the deletion of Grp94 alone, or in combination with Pten, using the albumin-cre system. We demonstrated that while deletion of GRP94 in the liver led to hyperproliferation of liver progenitor cells, deletion of both GRP94 and PTEN accelerated development of liver tumors, including both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), suggestive of progenitor cell origin. Furthermore, at the premalignant stage we observed disturbance of cell adhesion proteins and minor liver injury. When GRP94 was deleted in PTEN-null livers, ERK was selectively activated.

Conclusion: GRP94 is a novel regulator of cell adhesion, liver homeostasis, and tumorigenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hyperproliferation of cells adjacent to portal veins in cGrp94f/f livers. (A) Liver PCR genotyping and (B) Western blot of liver lysates at 2 months. (C) Liver appearance and weight at indicated ages. (D) Liver H&E staining and Ki67 staining of proliferative cells (black arrows) at 2 months and 9 months. Insets show 2X magnification. PV: portal vein. (E) Immunofluorescence staining with LPC marker A6 (green) and Ki67 (red) in cGrp94f/f frozen liver sections. White arrows denote double-positive cells. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Quantitation of Ki67+ cells (left) (student’s t test) and A6, Ki67 double-positive cells (right) (χ2 test). Scale bar: 25 μm. All data are presented as mean ± s.e. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Increased LPC pool in cGrp94f/f mice. (A) Immunofluorescence staining with LPC markers A6 (green) and panCK (red) in frozen liver sections at 2 months. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (B) Quantitation of PVs bearing over 50 A6+ cells (**P<0.01 and ***P<0.001; χ2 test). (C) Quantitation and examples of free A6+ cells (white arrows) in cGrp94f/f livers. (D) Plasma ALT, total bilirubin, and ALP measurements (*P<0.05 and **P<0.01). (E) TUNEL staining (red) of liver sections for apoptotic cells (white arrows) at 2 months. (F) Necrosis marker HMGB1 staining. PV: portal vein. Scale bar: 50 μm. All data are presented as mean ± s.e.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Disruption of cell adhesion molecules in cGrp94f/f livers at 2 months. (A and B) Immunofluorescence staining of Cx26 (A) and Cx32 (B) in frozen liver sections. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Schematic drawing of E-cadherin zonal expression pattern (red) in WT and diffuse expression (pink) in cGrp94f/f livers. Immunofluorescence co-staining of integrin β1 (green) and E-cadherin (red) of the boxed areas (U1,2 and L1,2) is shown below. White arrows denote clusters of liver progenitor/bile duct cells expressing high levels of E-cadherin near PVs. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of E-cadherin (green) and panCK (red). Double-positive cells are indicated by white arrows. PV: portal vein; CV: central vein. Scale bar (C, D): 50 μm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Biallelic deletion of Pten and Grp94 in the liver accelerates liver tumorigenesis. (A) Western blot of liver lysates at 2 months. (B) Liver H&E and Ki67 staining at 2 months showing proliferative cells (black arrows). Arrowheads denote bile ducts. Scale bar: 25 μm. (C) Liver appearance and weight at 8–9 months presented as mean ± s.e. (**P<0.01 and ***P<0.001). (D) Same as B but at 8–9 months.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
HCC and CC formation in cPtenf/fGrp94f/f mice. (A) Liver tumor spectrum. Each circle represents one mouse. The solid and open circles represent mice with and without tumors, respectively. (B) H&E staining of liver tumors in cPf/f94f/f mice (8 months) showed compact trabecular growth structures of HCC and altered tubule structures protruding to the duct lumen characteristic of CC. Right panels represent 2X magnification of the boxed regions. (C) Immunofluorescence staining with HepPar1 (green) and panCK (red) identified HCC and CC, respectively in cPf/f94f/f livers (9 months). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). PV: portal vein. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Expansion of LPCs in cPtenf/fGrp94f/f mice. (A) Quantitative PCR analysis of LPC markers EpCAM, AFP, and CK19. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of cPf/f94f/f livers at 9 months with HepPar1 (green) and panCK (red) identifies bi-lineage LPCs (white arrows). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). PV: portal vein. Scale bar: 25 μm. (C) Plasma ALT measurements. (D) Quantitation of liver TUNEL staining at 2 months. All data are presented as mean ± s.e. (*P<0.05 and **P<0.01).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Disturbance of cell junctions in cPtenf/fGrp94f/f livers at 2 months. Immunofluorescence staining of Cx26 (A) and Cx32 (B) in frozen liver section. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Schematic drawings of liver E-cadherin expression patterns. PV: portal vein; CV: central vein. Double staining of integrin β1 (green) and E-cadherin (red) of the boxed areas (U1,2,3 and L1,2,3) is shown below. White arrows indicate clusters of liver progenitor/bile duct cells with strong E-cadherin. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
ERK activation in premalignant cPtenf/fGrp94f/f livers at 2 months. (A) Representative Western blots of liver lysates for the indicated proteins. (B) Same as (A) except ERK was analyzed. (C) Staining of p-ERK in the liver. The boxed area was enlarged with black arrows denoting positive cells morphologically similar to LPCs. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Summary model on how hepatic GRP94 depletion promotes PTEN-null induced tumorigenesis. PV: portal vein.

Comment in

References

    1. Roskams T. Liver stem cells and their implication in hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Oncogene. 2006;25:3818–3822. - PubMed
    1. Galicia VA, He L, Dang H, Kanel G, Vendryes C, French BA, Zeng N, et al. Expansion of hepatic tumor progenitor cells in Pten-null mice requires liver injury and is reversed by loss of AKT2. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2170–2182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ni M, Lee AS. ER chaperones in mammalian development and human diseases. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3641–3651. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eletto D, Dersh D, Argon Y. GRP94 in ER quality control and stress responses. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:479–485. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinken M, Henkens T, De Rop E, Fraczek J, Vanhaecke T, Rogiers V. Biology and pathobiology of gap junctional channels in hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2008;47:1077–1088. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms